These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29330686)

  • 21. Unconscious attention modulates the silencing effect of top-down predictions.
    Chen X; Ran G; Zhang Q; Hu T
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Jul; 34():63-72. PubMed ID: 25841210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The pain was greater if it will happen again: the effect of anticipated continuation on retrospective discomfort.
    Galak J; Meyvis T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 21299317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Previously acquired cue-outcome structural knowledge guides new learning: Evidence from the retroactive-interference-between-cues effect.
    Luque D; Morís J; López FJ; Cobos PL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):916-931. PubMed ID: 28405958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Category-specific features and valence in action-effect prediction: An EEG study.
    Vincent R; Hsu YF; Waszak F
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Feb; 123():220-225. PubMed ID: 27989513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When anticipation beats accuracy: Threat alters memory for dynamic scenes.
    Greenstein M; Franklin N; Martins M; Sewack C; Meier MA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):633-49. PubMed ID: 26698159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reward associations magnify memory-based biases on perception.
    Doallo S; Patai EZ; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 25(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 23066690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Familiarity affects environmental sound processing outside the focus of attention: an event-related potential study.
    Kirmse U; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):887-96. PubMed ID: 19345610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Introducing an EXperimental Paradigm to investigate Expectation Change (EXPEC).
    Kube T; Rief W; Gollwitzer M; Glombiewski JA
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 59():92-99. PubMed ID: 29253640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Traumatic brain injury and prospective memory: influence of task complexity.
    Henry JD; Phillips LH; Crawford JR; Kliegel M; Theodorou G; Summers F
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Jul; 29(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 17564911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Influence of Attention Set, Working Memory Capacity, and Expectations on Inattentional Blindness.
    Kreitz C; Furley P; Memmert D; Simons DJ
    Perception; 2016 Apr; 45(4):386-99. PubMed ID: 26562879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Colour expectations during object perception are associated with early and late modulations of electrophysiological activity.
    Stojanoski BB; Niemeier M
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2925-34. PubMed ID: 26139090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of temporal predictability in semantic expectation: An MEG investigation.
    Lau EF; Nguyen E
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():8-19. PubMed ID: 25890389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional resources modulate error processing-related brain electrical activity: Evidence from a dual-task design.
    Han M; Shi L; Jia S
    Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 1670():68-75. PubMed ID: 28578905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reward expectation and prediction error in human medial frontal cortex: an EEG study.
    Silvetti M; Nuñez Castellar E; Roger C; Verguts T
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():376-82. PubMed ID: 24007806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The attentional boost effect really is a boost: evidence from a new baseline.
    Swallow KM; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jul; 76(5):1298-307. PubMed ID: 24806406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study.
    Auksztulewicz R; Friston K
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Nov; 25(11):4273-83. PubMed ID: 25596591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Divided attention enhances explicit but not implicit conceptual memory: an item-specific account of the attentional boost effect.
    Spataro P; Mulligan NW; Bechi Gabrielli G; Rossi-Arnaud C
    Memory; 2017 Feb; 25(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 26881481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reward-enhanced memory in younger and older adults.
    Spaniol J; Schain C; Bowen HJ
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 Sep; 69(5):730-40. PubMed ID: 23690000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interactions among emotional attention, encoding, and retrieval of ambiguous information: An eye-tracking study.
    Everaert J; Koster EHW
    Emotion; 2015 Oct; 15(5):539-543. PubMed ID: 25775233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temporal cues and the attentional blink: a further examination of the role of expectancy in sequential object perception.
    Visser TA; Tang MF; Badcock DR; Enns JT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2212-20. PubMed ID: 24935807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.