277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29331405)
1. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Özcebe E; Aydinli FE; Tiğrak TK; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):382.e1-382.e10. PubMed ID: 29331405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V): A Reliability and Validity Study.
Ertan-Schlüter E; Demirhan E; Ünsal EM; Tadıhan-Özkan E
J Voice; 2020 Nov; 34(6):965.e13-965.e22. PubMed ID: 31208840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Zraick RI; Kempster GB; Connor NP; Thibeault S; Klaben BK; Bursac Z; Thrush CR; Glaze LE
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Feb; 20(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 20739631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Relationship Between Auditory-Perceptual Rating Scales and Objective Voice Measures in Children With Voice Disorders.
Fujiki RB; Thibeault SL
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jan; 30(1):228-238. PubMed ID: 33439742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and Validity of the Kannada Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
Gunjawate DR; Ravi R; Bhagavan S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 63(2):385-392. PubMed ID: 32073338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Mozzanica F; Ginocchio D; Borghi E; Bachmann C; Schindler A
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 24714558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and Validation of Sentences in Tamil for Psychoacoustic Evaluation of Voice Using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
Venkatraman Y; Mahalingam S; Boominathan P
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 65(12):4539-4556. PubMed ID: 36368051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Mandarin Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and Its Reliability.
Chen Z; Fang R; Zhang Y; Ge P; Zhuang P; Chou A; Jiang J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 61(10):2451-2457. PubMed ID: 30242389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the Spanish adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Núñez-Batalla F; Morato-Galán M; García-López I; Ávila-Menéndez A
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2015; 66(5):249-57. PubMed ID: 25443295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.
Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; de Souza GS; Hachiya A; Tsuji DH
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e7-765.e11. PubMed ID: 26627119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
Kondo K; Mizuta M; Kawai Y; Sogami T; Fujimura S; Kojima T; Abe C; Tanaka R; Shiromoto O; Uozumi R; Kishimoto Y; Tateya I; Omori K; Haji T
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):4754-4761. PubMed ID: 34752149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cultural and Linguistic Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Into Hindi.
Joshi A; Baheti I; Angadi V
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3974-3981. PubMed ID: 33226868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders.
Karnell MP; Melton SD; Childes JM; Coleman TC; Dailey SA; Hoffman HT
J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):576-90. PubMed ID: 16822648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and Validation of the Bilingual Catalan/Spanish Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
Calaf N; Garcia-Quintana D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Apr; 67(4):1072-1089. PubMed ID: 38527275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
