399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29331406)
1. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory Training With Synthesized Voice Anchors: Effects on Rater Agreement.
Gama ACC; da Mata SM; Martins Dos Santos PC; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Quinino RDC
J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):366-375. PubMed ID: 34702611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of synthesized voice anchors on auditory-perceptual voice evaluation.
Santos PCMD; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
Codas; 2021; 33(1):e20190197. PubMed ID: 33950146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Training With Anchors on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia in Speech-Language Pathology Students.
Wong DW; Chan RW; Wu CH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 64(4):1136-1156. PubMed ID: 33769849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual Error Identification of Human and Synthesized Voices.
Englert M; Madazio G; Gielow I; Lucero J; Behlau M
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):639.e17-23. PubMed ID: 26337775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Özcebe E; Aydinli FE; Tiğrak TK; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):382.e1-382.e10. PubMed ID: 29331405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.
Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Fernandes ACN; de Souza Medved DM; da Silva EM; Júnior FB
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):774.e1-774.e8. PubMed ID: 28318969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory-perceptual Assessment of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.
Contreras-Ruston F; Guzman M; Castillo-Allendes A; Cantor-Cutiva L; Behlau M
J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):654-659. PubMed ID: 34903393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual-auditory and Acoustic Analysis of Air Traffic Controllers' Voices Pre- and Postshift.
Villar AC; Korn GP; Azevedo RR
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):768.e11-768.e15. PubMed ID: 26778327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Relationship Between the Aerodynamic Parameters of Voice and Perceptual Evaluation in the Iranian Population With or Without Voice Disorders.
Aghajanzadeh M; Darouie A; Dabirmoghaddam P; Salehi A; Rahgozar M
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):250.e9-250.e15. PubMed ID: 27542776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
