155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29333191)
1. Comparative evaluation of six parametric Robinson and three parametric Howell's modification of Scarf-BloomRichardson grading method on breast aspirates with histopathology: A prospective study.
Walke VA; Gunjkar G
Cytojournal; 2017; 14():31. PubMed ID: 29333191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. To Evaluate the Applicability of Parameters of Cytological Grading Systems on Aspirates of Breast Carcinoma.
Srivastava P; Kumar B; Joshi U; Bano M
J Cytol; 2018; 35(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 29403164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of Robinson's Cytological Grading with Elston and Ellis' Nottingham Modification of Bloom Richardson Score of Histopathology for Breast Carcinoma.
Gandhi H; Maru A; Shah N; Mansuriya RK; Rathod G; Parmar P
Maedica (Bucur); 2023 Mar; 18(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 37266482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma.
Arul P; Masilamani S
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol; 2016; 37(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 27168704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytological grading of breast carcinoma on fine needle aspirates and its relation with histological grading.
Phukan JP; Sinha A; Deka JP
South Asian J Cancer; 2015; 4(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 25839018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlative Evaluation of Seven Cytological 3-Tier Grading Systems of Breast Carcinoma with the Standard Histological Grading: A 4 and ½ Year Study.
Pai S; Murthy V S
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(5):482-492. PubMed ID: 37331335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of six cytological grading systems in breast carcinoma.
Saha K; Raychaudhuri G; Chattopadhyay BK; Das I
J Cytol; 2013 Apr; 30(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23833396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of the modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading system on breast carcinoma aspirates and histopathology.
Bansal C; Singh US; Misra S; Sharma KL; Tiwari V; Srivastava AN
Cytojournal; 2012; 9():4. PubMed ID: 22363393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlative Study of Cytological Features in Grading of Invasive Breast Carcinoma.
Sinha A; Gill SS
J Cytol; 2018; 35(3):149-152. PubMed ID: 30089943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytohistological correlation of grading in breast carcinoma.
Lingegowda JB; MuddeGowda PH; Ramakantha CK; Chandrasekar HR
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Apr; 39(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 21416638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3-tier cytological grading systems for breast carcinoma.
Einstien D; Omprakash BO; Ganapathy H; Rahman S
ISRN Oncol; 2014; 2014():252103. PubMed ID: 25006503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cytological grading of malignant neoplasms of the breast and its correlation with the histological grading.
Vasudev V; R R; V G
J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Jun; 7(6):1035-9. PubMed ID: 23905097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of grading and hormone receptor immunostaining on fine needle aspirates in carcinoma breast.
Handa U; Kumar A; Kundu R; Dalal U; Mohan H
J Cytol; 2015; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25948935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinomas.
Robinson IA; McKee G; Nicholson A; D'Arcy J; Jackson PA; Cook MG; Kissin MW
Lancet; 1994 Apr; 343(8903):947-9. PubMed ID: 7909010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytological Grading of Breast Carcinomas and Its Prognostic Implications.
Rajendran K; Sudalaimuthu M; Ganapathy S
Cureus; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e29385. PubMed ID: 36304360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson tumor grading system to fine-needle aspirates of the breast.
Howell LP; Gandour-Edwards R; O'Sullivan D
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Mar; 101(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 8135179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robinson's cytological grading on aspirates of breast carcinoma: Correlation with Bloom Richardson's histological grading.
Sinha S; Sinha N; Bandyopadhyay R; Mondal SK
J Cytol; 2009 Oct; 26(4):140-3. PubMed ID: 21938177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FNAC of Breast Lesions with Special Reference to IAC Standardized Reporting and Comparative Study of Cytohistological Grading of Breast Carcinoma.
Panwar H; Ingle P; Santosh T; Singh V; Bugalia A; Hussain N
J Cytol; 2020; 37(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 31942096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of grading of breast carcinomas in fine needle aspirates by two methods.
Das AK; Kapila K; Dinda AK; Verma K
Indian J Med Res; 2003 Dec; 118():247-50. PubMed ID: 14870798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of cytologic grading in prognostication of invasive breast carcinoma.
Khan N; Afroz N; Rana F; Khan M
J Cytol; 2009 Apr; 26(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 21938155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
