These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29333239)

  • 21. Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients.
    de Wit M; Teunissen T; van Houtum L; Weide M
    Res Involv Engagem; 2018; 4():27. PubMed ID: 30186624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications.
    Mayo NE; Brophy J; Goldberg MS; Klein MB; Miller S; Platt RW; Ritchie J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 16828678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A randomized trial of fellowships for early career researchers finds a high reliability in funding decisions.
    Clarke P; Herbert D; Graves N; Barnett AG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():147-51. PubMed ID: 26004515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Enabling research capacity strengthening within a consortium context: a qualitative study.
    Aiyenigba A; Abomo P; Wiltgen Georgi N; Bates I; Pulford J
    BMJ Glob Health; 2022 Jun; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 35764358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A framework for managing health research capacity strengthening consortia: addressing tensions and enhancing capacity outcomes.
    Tagoe N; Pulford J; Kinyanjui S; Molyneux S
    BMJ Glob Health; 2022 Oct; 7(10):. PubMed ID: 36192051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Promoting sustainable research partnerships: a mixed-method evaluation of a United Kingdom-Africa capacity strengthening award scheme.
    Dean L; Njelesani J; Smith H; Bates I
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2015 Dec; 13():81. PubMed ID: 26695073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion.
    Gallo SA; Schmaling KB; Thompson LA; Glisson SR
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2020; 5():7. PubMed ID: 32467777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.
    Steinert Y; Naismith L; Mann K
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(6):483-503. PubMed ID: 22578043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?: An Empirical Investigation Using the Example of the Austrian Science Fund.
    Mutz R; Bornmann L; Daniel HD
    Z Psychol; 2012; 220(2):121-129. PubMed ID: 23480982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recommendations for Reviewers of Biomedical Imaging Grant Applications.
    Pagel MD
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Aug; 21(4):612-619. PubMed ID: 30460624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
    Kotchen TA; Lindquist T; Malik K; Ehrenfeld E
    JAMA; 2004 Feb; 291(7):836-43. PubMed ID: 14970062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of external peer reviewer scores for funding applications on funding board decisions: a retrospective analysis of 1561 reviews.
    Sorrell L; Mcardle N; Becque T; Payne H; Stuart B; Turner S; Wyatt JC
    BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e022547. PubMed ID: 30552251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing policy-makers', academics' and experts' satisfaction with the performance of the Palestinian health research system: a qualitative study.
    AlKhaldi M; Abed Y; Pfeiffer C; Haj-Yahia S; Alkaiyat A; Tanner M
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jul; 16(1):66. PubMed ID: 30045746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.