236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2933335)
1. Recent evidence on case-based systems for setting hospital rates.
Hellinger FJ
Inquiry; 1985; 22(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 2933335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medicaid and Blue Cross DRG payment plans: a comparison.
Grimaldi PL
Health Prog; 1985 Oct; 66(8):48-55, 79-80. PubMed ID: 10311310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.
Atkinson G; Murray R
J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The distributional implications of using relative prices in DRG payment systems.
Thorpe KE
Inquiry; 1987; 24(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 2951338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of the New Jersey all-payer DRG system.
Rosko MD; Broyles RW
Inquiry; 1986; 23(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 2937731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of hospital performance under the partial-payer Medicare PPS and state all-payer rate-setting systems.
Rosko MD
Inquiry; 1989; 26(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 2523344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DRG revisions: year III.
Bartlett RL
Mich Hosp; 1986 Jan; 22(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 10311410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is compression occurring in DRG prices?
Lave JR
Inquiry; 1985; 22(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 3159670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The process of hospital rate regulation: the New York experience.
Ruchlin HS; Rosen HM
Inquiry; 1981; 18(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 6453093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Philly spawns 'son of DRGs'.
Gallivan M
Hospitals; 1986 May; 60(9):46, 48. PubMed ID: 3084376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 1998 rates--HCFA. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1997 Jun; 62(105):29902-31069. PubMed ID: 10169823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hospital cost and efficiency under per service and per case payment in Maryland: a tale of the carrot and the stick.
Salkever DS; Steinwachs DM; Rupp A
Inquiry; 1986; 23(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 2937730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective per diem rates for skilled nursing care.
Grimaldi PL
J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):49-62. PubMed ID: 12079151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective reimbursement in Western Pennsylvania.
Sumner M; Gaumer G
Top Health Care Financ; 1979; 6(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 582632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiency, costs, and quality: the New Jersey experience revisited.
Broyles RW
Inquiry; 1990; 27(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 2139010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2006 rates. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2005 Aug; 70(155):47277-707. PubMed ID: 16097095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Getting the price right: Medicare payment rates for cardiovascular services.
Hayes KJ; Pettengill J; Stensland J
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 17211021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selected results from an evaluation of the New Jersey Diagnosis-Related Group System.
May JJ; Wasserman J
Health Serv Res; 1984 Dec; 19(5):547-59. PubMed ID: 6438023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The origins, development, and passage of Medicare's revolutionary prospective payment system.
Mayes R
J Hist Med Allied Sci; 2007 Jan; 62(1):21-55. PubMed ID: 16467485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Payment of hospital cardiac services.
Unger WJ
Hosp Technol Ser; 1991; 10(26):1-148. PubMed ID: 10115896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
