162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29333463)
1. Characteristics of Smoothing Filters to Achieve the Guideline Recommended Positron Emission Tomography Image without Harmonization.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Umezu Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2018; 6(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 29333463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicentre analysis of PET SUV using vendor-neutral software: the Japanese Harmonization Technology (J-Hart) study.
Tsutsui Y; Daisaki H; Akamatsu G; Umeda T; Ogawa M; Kajiwara H; Kawase S; Sakurai M; Nishida H; Magota K; Mori K; Sasaki M;
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Aug; 8(1):83. PubMed ID: 30128776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-scanner Aβ-PET harmonization using barrel phantom spatial resolution matching.
Ruwanpathirana GP; Williams RC; Masters CL; Rowe CC; Johnston LA; Davey CE
Alzheimers Dement (Amst); 2024; 16(1):e12561. PubMed ID: 38476638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Tumor-Pixel Positioning on the Variability of SUV Measurements in PET Images.
Itagaki K; Mitsumoto K; Kajisako M; Shioji M; Kawase S
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2023; 11(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 36619185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of
Alqahtani MM; Willowson KP; Constable C; Fulton R; Kench PL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13528. PubMed ID: 35049129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial evaluation of the Celesteion large-bore PET/CT scanner in accordance with the NEMA NU2-2012 standard and the Japanese guideline for oncology FDG PET/CT data acquisition protocol version 2.0.
Kaneta T; Ogawa M; Motomura N; Iizuka H; Arisawa T; Hino-Shishikura A; Yoshida K; Inoue T
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Oct; 7(1):83. PubMed ID: 29022216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Harmonization based on quantitative analysis of standardized uptake value variations across PET/CT scanners: a multicenter phantom study.
Monsef A; Ay MR; Sheikhzadeh P; Geramifar P; Rahmim A; Ghafarian P
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Sep; 43(9):1004-1014. PubMed ID: 35836388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a digital phantom developed by QIBA for harmonizing SUVs obtained from the state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter study.
Nakahara T; Daisaki H; Yamamoto Y; Iimori T; Miyagawa K; Okamoto T; Owaki Y; Yada N; Sawada K; Tokorodani R; Jinzaki M
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):53. PubMed ID: 28639254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Edge Artifacts in Point Spread Function-based PET Reconstruction in Relation to Object Size and Reconstruction Parameters.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Umezu Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2017; 5(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 28660224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PET NEMA IQ Phantom dataset: image reconstruction settings for quantitative PET imaging.
Vosoughi H; Hajizadeh M; Emami F; Momennezhad M; Geramifar P
Data Brief; 2021 Aug; 37():107231. PubMed ID: 34195308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating and comparing the image quality and quantification accuracy of SiPM-PET/CT and PMT-PET/CT.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Kato T; Baba S; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):725-735. PubMed ID: 32621167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 on Siemens Biograph TruePoint PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim JY; Kim BI; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2015 Feb; 30(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25549151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multicenter quantitative
Vosoughi H; Momennezhad M; Emami F; Hajizadeh M; Rahmim A; Geramifar P
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2218-2233. PubMed ID: 37064407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Harmonization of Standardized Uptake Value among Different Generation PET/ CT Cameras Based on a Phantom Experiment -Utility of SUV(peak)].
Akamatsu G; Nishida H; Fujino A; Ohnishi A; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Sep; 71(9):735-45. PubMed ID: 26400557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
