These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29333650)

  • 1. Comments on "Longitudinal beta-binomial modeling using GEE for overdispersed binomial data".
    Inan G
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):503-505. PubMed ID: 29333650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal beta-binomial modeling using GEE for overdispersed binomial data.
    Wu H; Zhang Y; Long JD
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):1029-1040. PubMed ID: 27917499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models.
    Gardner W; Mulvey EP; Shaw EC
    Psychol Bull; 1995 Nov; 118(3):392-404. PubMed ID: 7501743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quasi-Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data?
    Ver Hoef JM; Boveng PL
    Ecology; 2007 Nov; 88(11):2766-72. PubMed ID: 18051645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pooling overdispersed binomial data to estimate event rate.
    Young-Xu Y; Chan KA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Aug; 8():58. PubMed ID: 18713448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the dependence between the number of trials and the success probability in binary trials.
    Faddy MJ; Smith DM
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1112-4. PubMed ID: 16401285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the dependence between number of trials and success probability in beta-binomial-Poisson mixture distributions.
    Zhu J; Eickhoff JC; Kaiser MS
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):955-61. PubMed ID: 14969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A score test for overdispersion in zero-inflated poisson mixed regression model.
    Xiang L; Lee AH; Yau KK; McLachlan GJ
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1608-22. PubMed ID: 16794991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose-time-response modeling using negative binomial distribution.
    Roy M; Choudhury K; Islam MM; Matin MA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(6):1249-60. PubMed ID: 24138430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Joint Poisson State-Space Modelling Approach to Analysis of Binomial Series with Random Cluster Sizes.
    Yan G; Ma R; Tariqul Hasan M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Mar; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30897063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Count data distributions and their zero-modified equivalents as a framework for modelling microbial data with a relatively high occurrence of zero counts.
    Gonzales-Barron U; Kerr M; Sheridan JJ; Butler F
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 136(3):268-77. PubMed ID: 19913934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The analysis of incontinence episodes and other count data in patients with overactive bladder by Poisson and negative binomial regression.
    Martina R; Kay R; van Maanen R; Ridder A
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 25524209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On performance of parametric and distribution-free models for zero-inflated and over-dispersed count responses.
    Tang W; Lu N; Chen T; Wang W; Gunzler DD; Han Y; Tu XM
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(24):3235-45. PubMed ID: 26078035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving removal-based estimates of abundance by sampling a population of spatially distinct subpopulations.
    Dorazio RM; Jelks HL; Jordan F
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1093-101. PubMed ID: 16401283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental verification of overdispersion in radioassay data.
    Semkow TM
    Health Phys; 2002 Oct; 83(4):485-96. PubMed ID: 12240723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction intervals for overdispersed binomial data with application to historical controls.
    Menssen M; Schaarschmidt F
    Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(14):2652-2663. PubMed ID: 30835886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A methodology to design heuristics for model selection based on the characteristics of data: Application to investigate when the Negative Binomial Lindley (NB-L) is preferred over the Negative Binomial (NB).
    Shirazi M; Dhavala SS; Lord D; Geedipally SR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():186-194. PubMed ID: 28886410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A hierarchical Binomial-Poisson model for the analysis of a crossover design for correlated binary data when the number of trials is dose-dependent.
    Shkedy Z; Molenberghs G; Van Craenendonck H; Steckler T; Bijnens L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 15796291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on 'How conservative is Fisher's exact test? A quantitative evaluation of the two-sample comparative binomial trial' by G. G. Crans and J. J. Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:3598-3611.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):173-4. PubMed ID: 18825654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comments on 'Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2x2 contingency tables', by S.-H. Kang and C. W. Ahn, Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:2524-2535.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 19125396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.