These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29335268)

  • 1. Fertility advocates protest criminal sanctions in assisted reproduction act.
    Motluk A
    CMAJ; 2018 Jan; 190(2):E58-E59. PubMed ID: 29335268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulating reproductive technologies: panacea or paper tiger?
    Daar JF
    Houst Law Rev; 1997; 34(3):609-64. PubMed ID: 12680374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clones, controversy, and criminal law: a comment on the proposal for legislation governing assisted human reproduction.
    Caulfield T
    Alta Law Rev; 2001 Sep; 39(2):335-45. PubMed ID: 12611408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproduction--Canada's Supreme Court and the "global baby".
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Aug; 365(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 21812677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Assisted Human Reproduction Act.
    Claman P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2007 Apr; 29(4):303-304. PubMed ID: 17475121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulating preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a criminal model versus a professional model.
    Petersen K
    J Law Med; 2009 Dec; 17(3):452-61. PubMed ID: 20169804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Politics, prohibitions and the lost public perspective: a comment on Bill C-56: the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.
    Caulfield T
    Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):451-63. PubMed ID: 16211737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies.
    Bernier L; Grégoire D
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Dec; 30(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 15574437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics council calls for probe into assisted reproduction.
    Check E
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6983):590. PubMed ID: 15071563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multifetal pregnancy reduction in assisted reproductive technologies: a license to kill?
    Khanijou S
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(2):403-30. PubMed ID: 16538758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bill C-13 The Assisted Human Reproduction Act: examining the arguments against a regulatory approach.
    Caulfield T
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 15739313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the federal government in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Lal M
    Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1997; 13(2):517-43. PubMed ID: 16528854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The demise of Assisted Human Reproduction Canada.
    Baylis F
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Jun; 34(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 22673165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining a policy rationale for the criminal regulation of reproductive technologies.
    Campbell A
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15739314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Loving infertile couple seeks woman age 18-31 to help have baby. $6,500 plus expenses and a gift": should we regulate the use of assisted reproductive technologies by older women?
    Jayson SA
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2001; 11(2):287-336. PubMed ID: 12611407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted human reproduction: Canada needs a uniform code of practice.
    McTeer MA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Apr; 33(4):323-325. PubMed ID: 21501536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-awaited regulations bring clarity to assisted reproduction act.
    Motluk A
    CMAJ; 2019 Aug; 191(32):E902-E903. PubMed ID: 31405842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clones, controversy, confusion and criminal law: a reply to Professor Caulfield.
    Anand S
    Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 16211738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wombs for rent: an examination of prohibitory and regulatory approaches to governing preconception arrangements.
    Chen M
    Health Law Can; 2003 Feb; 23(3):33-50. PubMed ID: 12674583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Criminal code and assisted human reproduction].
    Cortés Bechiarelli E
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2009; (31):43-77. PubMed ID: 20476690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.