These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29335385)

  • 21. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
    Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Access Site Choice on Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Pancholy MS; Skelding K; Scott T; Blankenship J; Pancholy SB
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(12):2141-2145. PubMed ID: 29100589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Piccolo R; Galasso G; Capuano E; De Luca S; Esposito G; Trimarco B; Piscione F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96127. PubMed ID: 24820096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
    Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ultrahigh-resolution ultrasound characterization of access site trauma and intimal hyperplasia following use of a 7F sheathless guide versus 6F sheath/guide combination for transradial artery PCI: Results of the PRAGMATIC trial.
    Batchelor W; Dahya V; McGee D; Katopodis J; Dixon W; Campbell J; Meredith A; Knap P; Parkin M; Noel T
    Am Heart J; 2018 Apr; 198():75-83. PubMed ID: 29653651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feasibility of Transradial Access for Coronary Interventions Via Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Radial Artery in Cases of Functional Radial Occlusion.
    Schulte-Hermes M; Klein-Wiele O; Vorpahl M; Seyfarth M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 30(10):355-359. PubMed ID: 30108190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach in Bypass Grafts.
    Dai Y; Li C; Zhang F; Yang J; Chang S; Lu H; Yang H; Huang Z; Qian J; Ge L; Ge J
    Angiology; 2018 Feb; 69(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 28602142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
    Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of vascular access on outcome after PCI in patients at high bleeding risk: a pre-specified sub-analysis of the LEADERS FREE trial.
    Jiménez Díaz VA; Hovasse T; Íñiguez A; Copt S; Byrne J; Brunel P; Morice MC; Abizaid A; Tespilli M; Walters D; Ortiz Sáez A; Bastos Fernández G; Stoll HP; Urban P
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2020 Jul; 73(7):536-545. PubMed ID: 31563471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of age on access site-related outcomes in 469,983 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: Insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.
    Anderson SG; Ratib K; Myint PK; Keavney B; Kwok CS; Zaman A; Ludman PF; de Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA; ;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(6):965-72. PubMed ID: 25676689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of Duration of Hemostatic Compression on Radial Artery Occlusion after Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Rahman A; Uddin MJ; Hussain KS; Dutta B; Rahaman MA; Ahmed S; Huda SN; Mondal B; Chowdhury MF; Jahan F
    Mymensingh Med J; 2023 Apr; 32(2):386-392. PubMed ID: 37002749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction : A randomized prospective multicenter trial.
    Schernthaner C; Hammerer M; Harb S; Heigert M; Hoellinger K; Lassnig E; Maurer E; Schuler J; Siostrzonek P; Ulmer H; Winter A; Altenberger J
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2018 Mar; 130(5-6):182-189. PubMed ID: 28900715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transradial versus trans-femoral access site in high-speed rotational atherectomy in Sweden.
    Desta L; Jurga J; Völz S; Omerovic E; Ulvenstam A; Zwackman S; Pagonis C; Calle F; Olivecrona GK; Persson J; Venetsanos D
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 352():45-51. PubMed ID: 35074496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients based on a propensity score analysis.
    He PY; Yang YJ; Qiao SB; Xu B; Yao M; Wu YJ; Yuan JQ; Chen J; Liu HB; Dai J; Tang XR; Wang Y; Li W; Gao RL
    Angiology; 2015 May; 66(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 24834930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
    Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ahsan MJ; Ahmad S; Latif A; Lateef N; Ahsan MZ; Abusnina W; Nathan S; Altin SE; Kolte DS; Messenger JC; Tannenbaum M; Goldsweig AM
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2022 Sep; 8(6):640-650. PubMed ID: 35460230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characteristics and outcome in cardiogenic shock according to vascular access site for percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Peters EJ; Bogerd M; Ten Berg S; Timmermans MJC; Engström AE; Thiele H; Jung C; Schrage B; Sjauw KD; Verouden NJW; Teeuwen K; Dedic A; Meuwissen M; Danse PW; Claessen BEPM; Henriques JPS;
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2024 Aug; 13(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 38920350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Femoral or Radial Approach in Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Gorgulu S; Kalay N; Norgaz T; Kocas C; Goktekin O; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Apr; 15(8):823-830. PubMed ID: 35450683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radial PCI and the obesity paradox: Insights from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2).
    McDonagh JR; Seth M; LaLonde TA; Khandewal AK; Wohns DH; Dixon SR; Gurm HS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 26010906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.