These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29335454)

  • 61. Fundamental-frequency discrimination based on temporal-envelope cues: Effects of bandwidth and interference.
    Mehta AH; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):EL423. PubMed ID: 30522318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Associations and dissociations between psychoacoustic abilities and speech perception in adolescents with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Segal O; Algom D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):956-72. PubMed ID: 19064905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Dichotic Listening Can Improve Perceived Clarity of Music in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vannson N; Innes-Brown H; Marozeau J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Aug; 19():. PubMed ID: 26316123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Temporal Cues in the Judgment of Music Emotion for Normal and Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Pathre T; Marozeau J
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231170501. PubMed ID: 37097919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.
    Limb CJ
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16974148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Evaluation of rhythmic and timbral perception by normal-hearing and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong RJ; Li J; Zhou Y; Qi BE; Chen XQ; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 22932144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Patient-Reported Outcomes From the United States Clinical Trial for a Hybrid Cochlear Implant.
    Kelsall DC; Arnold RJG; Lionnet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1251-1261. PubMed ID: 28777227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. How much residual hearing is 'useful' for music perception with cochlear implants?
    El Fata F; James CJ; Laborde ML; Fraysse B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():14-21. PubMed ID: 19390171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Psychoacoustic and Demographic Factors for Speech Recognition of Older Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Luo X; Kolberg C; Pulling KR; Azuma T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jun; 63(6):1712-1725. PubMed ID: 32501736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Leal MC; Shin YJ; Laborde ML; Calmels MN; Verges S; Lugardon S; Andrieu S; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Sep; 123(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 14575398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR; Won JH; Timme AO; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Can young adolescents with cochlear implants perceive different timbral cues?
    Kim SJ; Cho YS; Kim EY; Yoo GE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 24954191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Can unaided non-linguistic measures predict cochlear implant candidacy?
    Shim HJ; Won JH; Moon IJ; Anderson ES; Drennan WR; McIntosh NE; Weaver EM; Rubinstein JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1345-53. PubMed ID: 24901669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Improved perception of music with a harmonic based algorithm for cochlear implants.
    Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Jul; 21(4):684-94. PubMed ID: 23613083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Adult Cochlear Implant Users Are Able to Discriminate Basic Tonal Features in Musical Patterns: Evidence From Event-related Potentials.
    Hahne A; Mainka A; Leuner A; Mürbe D
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e360-8. PubMed ID: 27631660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Examination of spectral timbre cues and musical instrument identification in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Lang-Roth R; Streicher B; Walger M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24597635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Segmental and Suprasegmental Perception in Children Using Hearing Aids.
    Wenrich KA; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):901-912. PubMed ID: 29130438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).
    Zhu M; Chen B; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3562-5. PubMed ID: 22225012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.
    Horn DL; Dudley DJ; Dedhia K; Nie K; Drennan WR; Won JH; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):613. PubMed ID: 28147578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.