These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29335516)

  • 1. An evaluation of the effect of pulse-shape on grey and white matter stimulation in the rat brain.
    Deprez M; Luyck K; Luyten L; Tambuyzer T; Nuttin B; Mc Laughlin M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):752. PubMed ID: 29335516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perceptual effects of interphase gap duration in cochlear implant stimulation.
    McKay CM; Henshall KR
    Hear Res; 2003 Jul; 181(1-2):94-9. PubMed ID: 12855367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences of Intracranial Electrical Stimulation Thresholds in the Human Brain.
    Stephani C; Koubeissi M
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(4):724-9. PubMed ID: 25842075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suprachoroidal electrical stimulation: effects of stimulus pulse parameters on visual cortical responses.
    John SE; Shivdasani MN; Williams CE; Morley JW; Shepherd RK; Rathbone GD; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Oct; 10(5):056011. PubMed ID: 23928717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Local and distant cortical responses to single pulse intracranial stimulation in the human brain are differentially modulated by specific stimulation parameters.
    Paulk AC; Zelmann R; Crocker B; Widge AS; Dougherty DD; Eskandar EN; Weisholtz DS; Richardson RM; Cosgrove GR; Williams ZM; Cash SS
    Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(2):491-508. PubMed ID: 35247646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in the viscoelastic features of white and grey matter in tension.
    Zhang W; Zhang RR; Wu F; Feng LL; Yu SB; Wu CW
    J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):3990-3995. PubMed ID: 27855984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-rectangular waveforms for neural stimulation with practical electrodes.
    Sahin M; Tie Y
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Sep; 4(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 17873425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of the efficiency of the shape of chopped pulses using earthworm model.
    Dali M; Guiho T; Maciejasz P; Rossel O; Guiraud D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5483-5486. PubMed ID: 30441578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of a new charge-balanced biphasic electrical stimulus in the isolated sciatic nerve and the hippocampal slice.
    Cappaert NL; Ramekers D; Martens HC; Wadman WJ
    Int J Neural Syst; 2013 Feb; 23(1):1250031. PubMed ID: 23273127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy efficiency of pulse shaping in electrical stimulation: the interdependence of biophysical effects and circuit design losses.
    Varkevisser F; Costa TL; Serdijn WA
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Sep; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 36001921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses.
    Bahmer A; Polak M; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):75-85. PubMed ID: 19850116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of cortical local field potential diffusion in stereotactic electro-encephalography recordings: A glimpse on white matter signal.
    Mercier MR; Bickel S; Megevand P; Groppe DM; Schroeder CE; Mehta AD; Lado FA
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():219-232. PubMed ID: 27554533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the use of different waveforms for intravesical electrical stimulation: a study in the rat.
    De Bock F; Dirckx J; Wyndaele JJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Jan; 30(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 21181961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Somatotopic organization of the white matter tracts underpinning motor control in humans: an electrical stimulation study.
    Rech F; Herbet G; Moritz-Gasser S; Duffau H
    Brain Struct Funct; 2016 Sep; 221(7):3743-53. PubMed ID: 26459143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pulse Shaping Strategies for Electroceuticals: A Comprehensive Survey of the Use of Interphase Gaps in Miniature Stimulation Systems.
    Eickhoff S; Jarvis JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 May; 68(5):1658-1667. PubMed ID: 33651679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the tolerability of spatiotemporally complex electrical stimulation paradigms.
    Nelson TS; Suhr CL; Lai A; Halliday AJ; Freestone DR; McLean KJ; Burkitt AN; Cook MJ
    Epilepsy Res; 2011 Oct; 96(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 21795024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring the effects of aging and sex on regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults.
    Arani A; Murphy MC; Glaser KJ; Manduca A; Lake DS; Kruse SA; Jack CR; Ehman RL; Huston J
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 111():59-64. PubMed ID: 25698157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: triphasic pulses with cathodic second phase.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():123-30. PubMed ID: 24161948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Burst-Modulated Waveforms Optimize Electrical Stimuli for Charge Efficiency and Fiber Selectivity.
    Qing KY; Ward MP; Irazoqui PP
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Nov; 23(6):936-45. PubMed ID: 25872215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.