BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29335869)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE?
    Yoshida M; Nakaura T; Inoue T; Tanoue S; Takada S; Utsunomiya D; Tsumagari S; Harada K; Yamashita Y
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2436-2443. PubMed ID: 29335869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GRASE Revisited: breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3T.
    Nam JG; Lee JM; Kang HJ; Lee SM; Kim E; Peeters JM; Yoon JH
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3721-3728. PubMed ID: 29392471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid 3D breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography using deep learning-constrained compressed sensing reconstruction.
    Zhang Y; Peng W; Xiao Y; Ming Y; Ma K; Hu S; Zeng W; Zeng L; Liang Z; Zhang X; Xia C; Li Z
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2500-2509. PubMed ID: 36355200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid 3D navigator-triggered MR cholangiopancreatography with SPACE sequence at 3T: only one-third acquisition time of conventional 3D SPACE navigator-triggered MRCP.
    Sun B; Chen Z; Duan Q; Xue Y; Zheng E; He Y; Lin L; Li G; Zhang Z
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):134-140. PubMed ID: 31781898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usefulness of the SPACE pulse sequence at 1.5T MR cholangiography: comparison of image quality and image acquisition time with conventional 3D-TSE sequence.
    Nakaura T; Kidoh M; Maruyama N; Kawahara T; Namimoto T; Sakai Y; Harada K; Yamashita Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1014-9. PubMed ID: 24105679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) and compressed sensing sequences for single breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with T
    Morimoto-Ishikawa D; Hyodo T; Takenaka M; Matsukubo Y; Numoto I; Itoh M; Ohmi M; Kamata K; Ueda Y; Wakana M; Kudo M; Saito S; Ishii K
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 May; 150():110279. PubMed ID: 35364450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical impact of 3-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 3-dimensional turbo-spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Itatani R; Namimoto T; Takaoka H; Katahira K; Noda S; Toyonari N; Yamashita Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25299796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons between image quality and diagnostic performance of 2D- and breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T.
    Yoen H; Lee JM; Lee SM; Kang HJ; Bae JS; Kim E; Peeters JM; Yoon JH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8399-8407. PubMed ID: 33884471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-Dimensional Breath-Hold MRCP Using SPACE Pulse Sequence at 3 T: Comparison With Conventional Navigator-Triggered Technique.
    Chen Z; Sun B; Duan Q; Xue Y; Zheng E; He Y; Li G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1247-1252. PubMed ID: 31386572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Gradient and Spin-Echo in Breath-Hold 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.
    Jang W; Song JS; Kim SH; Yang JD
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33915832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison and evaluation of the efficacy of compressed SENSE (CS) and gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) in breath-hold (BH) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
    He M; Xu J; Sun Z; Wang S; Zhu L; Wang X; Wang J; Feng F; Xue H; Jin Z
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Mar; 51(3):824-832. PubMed ID: 31313426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Quality of Optimal MRCP Image Using RT-2D-Compressed SENSE(CS)Turbo Spin Echo: Comparing Respiratory Triggering(RT)-2D-SENSE Turbo Spin Echo and Breath Hold-2D-Single-Shot Turbo Spin Echo.
    Goo EH; Kim SS
    Tomography; 2022 May; 8(3):1374-1385. PubMed ID: 35645397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative evaluation of the cystic duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of navigator-gated prospective acquisition correction- and conventional respiratory-triggered techniques at free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography.
    Itatani R; Namimoto T; Kajihara H; Yoshimura A; Katahira K; Nasu J; Matsushita I; Sakamoto F; Kidoh M; Yamashita Y
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1911-8. PubMed ID: 23443353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 Tesla: Image quality comparison between 3D compressed sensing and 2D single-shot acquisitions.
    Lohöfer FK; Kaissis GA; Rasper M; Katemann C; Hock A; Peeters JM; Schlag C; Rummeny EJ; Karampinos D; Braren RF
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():53-58. PubMed ID: 31084759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of SPACE and 3D TSE MRCP at 1.5T focusing on difference in echo spacing.
    Morita S; Ueno E; Masukawa A; Suzuki K; Machida H; Fujimura M; Kojima S; Hirata M; Ohnishi T; Kitajima K; Kaji Y
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2009; 8(3):101-5. PubMed ID: 19783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of the Short-Echo Time Cube Sequence at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: Prospective Comparison With the Conventional 3-Dimensional Fast Spin-Echo Sequence.
    Itatani R; Namimoto T; Kusunoki S; Mizuguchi T; Ohtsuka S; Yamashita Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 26966952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using optimized integrated combination with parallel imaging and compressed sensing technique.
    Nagata S; Goshima S; Noda Y; Kawai N; Kajita K; Kawada H; Tanahashi Y; Matsuo M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1766-1772. PubMed ID: 30659308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of 3D hybrid profile order technique with 3T magnetic resonance cholangiography: Comparison of image quality and acquisition time.
    Yokoyama K; Nakaura T; Iyama Y; Sakamoto S; Takemura A; Okuaki T; Harada K; Yamashita Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1346-1353. PubMed ID: 27131338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical application of navigator-gated three-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 1.5 T.
    Itatani R; Namimoto T; Atsuji S; Katahira K; Yamashita Y
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jul; 41(7):1285-92. PubMed ID: 27026515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing compressed sensing breath-hold 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with two parallel imaging MRCP strategies in main pancreatic duct and common bile duct.
    Chen Z; Sun B; Xue Y; Duan Q; Zheng E; He Y; Li G; Zhang Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109833. PubMed ID: 34218123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.