200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29336119)
1. Evaluations of UltraiQ software for objective ultrasound image quality assessment using images from a commercial scanner.
Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Gorny KR; Hangiandreou NJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 29336119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Long Z; Tradup DJ; Song P; Stekel SF; Chen S; Glazebrook KN; Hangiandreou NJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):336-342. PubMed ID: 29542277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound grayscale image quality comparison between a 2D intracavitary transducer and a 3D intracavitary transducer used in 2D mode: A phantom study.
Zhou W; Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Browne JE; Brown DL; Hangiandreou NJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):134-140. PubMed ID: 31002482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation and validation of three automated methods for measuring ultrasound maximum depth of penetration: application to ultrasound quality control.
Gorny KR; Tradup DJ; Hangiandreou NJ
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2615-28. PubMed ID: 16193792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The automated assessment of ultrasound scanner lateral and slice thickness resolution: use of the step response.
Rowland DE; Newey VR; Turner DP; Nassiri DK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1525-34. PubMed ID: 19560252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 3D ultrasound scanning system for image guided liver interventions.
Neshat H; Cool DW; Barker K; Gardi L; Kakani N; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112903. PubMed ID: 24320470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The resolution integral: visual and computational approaches to characterizing ultrasound images.
MacGillivray TJ; Ellis W; Pye SD
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5067-88. PubMed ID: 20702928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality assurance in ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma using a standardized phantom and standard clinical images: a 3-year national investigation in Korea.
Choi JI; Jung SE; Kim PN; Cha SH; Jun JK; Lee HY; Park EC
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jun; 33(6):985-95. PubMed ID: 24866605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive Comparison of Image Quality Aspects Between Conventional and Plane-Wave Imaging Methods on a Commercial Scanner.
Hendriks GAGM; Weijers G; Chen C; Hertel M; Lee CY; Dueppenbecker PM; Radicke M; Milkowski A; Hansen HHG; de Korte CL
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Jun; 69(6):2039-2049. PubMed ID: 35404814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Method for automatic detection of defective ultrasound linear array transducers based on uniformity assessment of clinical images - A case study.
Lorentsson R; Hosseini N; Johansson JO; Rosenberg W; Stenborg B; Månsson LG; Båth M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 29322614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing.
Fabiszewska E; Pasicz K; Grabska I; Skrzyński W; Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk W; Bulski W
Pol J Radiol; 2017; 82():773-782. PubMed ID: 29657644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fully-automated quality assurance in multi-center studies using MRI phantom measurements.
Davids M; Zöllner FG; Ruttorf M; Nees F; Flor H; Schumann G; Schad LR;
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 32(6):771-80. PubMed ID: 24602825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design and development of a phantom for tomosynthesis with potential for automated analysis via the cloud.
Goodenough D; Levy J; Olafsdottir H; Olafsson I
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29508535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. US with extended field of view: phantom-tested accuracy of distance measurements.
Fornage BD; Atkinson EN; Nock LF; Jones PH
Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):579-84. PubMed ID: 10671615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phantoms and automated system for testing the resolution of ultrasound scanners.
Rownd JJ; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Frank GR; Dong F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(2):245-60. PubMed ID: 9140182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Bolus Transit Quantification With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Across Multiple Scanners and Analysis Software Packages-A Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Study.
Averkiou MA; Juang EK; Gallagher MK; Cuevas MA; Wilson SR; Barr RG; Carson PL
Invest Radiol; 2020 Oct; 55(10):643-656. PubMed ID: 32898356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound.
Sipilä O; Mannila V; Vartiainen E
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 21144687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a low-cost liquid ultrasound test object for detection of transducer artefacts.
King DM; Hangiandreou NJ; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):N557-70. PubMed ID: 21081828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phantom-based image quality test methods for photoacoustic imaging systems.
Vogt WC; Jia C; Wear KA; Garra BS; Pfefer TJ
J Biomed Opt; 2017 Sep; 22(9):1-14. PubMed ID: 28901055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
