These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29336354)

  • 21. A numerical framework for interstitial fluid pressure imaging in poroelastic MRE.
    Tan L; McGarry MDJ; Van Houten EEW; Ji M; Solamen L; Zeng W; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178521. PubMed ID: 28586393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determination of the mechanical and physical properties of cartilage by coupling poroelastic-based finite element models of indentation with artificial neural networks.
    Arbabi V; Pouran B; Campoli G; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA
    J Biomech; 2016 Mar; 49(5):631-637. PubMed ID: 26944689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Skinfold creep under load of caliper. Linear visco- and poroelastic model simulations.
    Nowak J; Nowak B; Kaczmarek M
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2015; 17(4):39-48. PubMed ID: 26899777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The poro-viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone: a micro computed tomography-based finite element study.
    Sandino C; McErlain DD; Schipilow J; Boyd SK
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Apr; 44():1-9. PubMed ID: 25591049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A poroelastic finite element formulation including transport and swelling in soft tissue structures.
    Simon BR; Liable JP; Pflaster D; Yuan Y; Krag MH
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Feb; 118(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8833068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A meta-model analysis of a finite element simulation for defining poroelastic properties of intervertebral discs.
    Nikkhoo M; Hsu YC; Haghpanahi M; Parnianpour M; Wang JL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jun; 227(6):672-82. PubMed ID: 23636748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Study on the biomechanical responses of the loaded bone in macroscale and mesoscale by multiscale poroelastic FE analysis.
    Yu W; Wu X; Cen H; Guo Y; Li C; Wang Y; Qin Y; Chen W
    Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Dec; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 31870380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A thermoporoelastic model for fluid transport in tumour tissues.
    Andreozzi A; Iasiello M; Netti PA
    J R Soc Interface; 2019 May; 16(154):20190030. PubMed ID: 31138093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of permeability on the performance of elastographic imaging techniques.
    Chaudhry A; Unnikrishnan G; Reddy JN; Krouskop TA; Righetti R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Feb; 32(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 23033327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An Analytical Poroelastic Model of a Nonhomogeneous Medium Under Creep Compression for Ultrasound Poroelastography Applications-Part I.
    Islam MT; Reddy JN; Righetti R
    J Biomech Eng; 2019 Jun; 141(6):. PubMed ID: 30029267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An axisymmetric poroelastic finite element formulation.
    Kang YJ; Gardner BK; Bolton JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):565-74. PubMed ID: 10462787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A fiber reinforced poroelastic model of nanoindentation of porcine costal cartilage: a combined experimental and finite element approach.
    Gupta S; Lin J; Ashby P; Pruitt L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Aug; 2(4):326-37; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 19627839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of vascular volume fraction and compressibility of the interstitial matrix on vascularised poroelastic tissues.
    Mascheroni P; Penta R; Merodio J
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2023 Dec; 22(6):1901-1917. PubMed ID: 37587330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of bone-soft tissue friction on ultrasound axial shear strain elastography.
    Tang S; Chaudhry A; Kim N; Reddy JN; Righetti R
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(15):6074-6091. PubMed ID: 28699617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Poroelastic Characterization and Modeling of Subcutaneous Tissue Under Confined Compression.
    Barsimantov J; Payne J; de Lucio M; Hakim M; Gomez H; Solorio L; Tepole AB
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2024 Jun; 52(6):1638-1652. PubMed ID: 38472602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Limitation of finite element analysis of poroelastic behavior of biological tissues undergoing rapid loading.
    Stokes IA; Chegini S; Ferguson SJ; Gardner-Morse MG; Iatridis JC; Laible JP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 38(5):1780-8. PubMed ID: 20306136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of various contact algorithms for poroelastic tissues.
    Galbusera F; Bashkuev M; Wilke HJ; Shirazi-Adl A; Schmidt H
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(12):1323-34. PubMed ID: 23244496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Poroelastic finite element analysis of a bone specimen under cyclic loading.
    Manfredini P; Cocchetti G; Maier G; Redaelli A; Montevecchi FM
    J Biomech; 1999 Feb; 32(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 10052918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental determination of the permeability in the lacunar-canalicular porosity of bone.
    Gailani G; Benalla M; Mahamud R; Cowin SC; Cardoso L
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Oct; 131(10):101007. PubMed ID: 19831477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Robust Method to Estimate the Time Constant of Elastographic Parameters.
    Islam MT; Chaudhry A; Righetti R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Jun; 38(6):1358-1370. PubMed ID: 30703014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.