These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29336820)

  • 21. Contribution to FE modeling for intraoperative pedicle screw strength prediction.
    Van den Abbeele M; Valiadis JM; Lima LVPC; Khalifé P; Rouch P; Skalli W
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Jan; 21(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 29226718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What is the best way to optimize thoracic kyphosis correction? A micro-CT and biomechanical analysis of pedicle morphology and screw failure.
    Lehman RA; Helgeson MD; Dmitriev AE; Paik H; Bevevino AJ; Gaume R; Kang DG; Lenke LG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1171-6. PubMed ID: 22614799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of bone quality on the performance of integrated fixation cage screws.
    Palepu V; Helgeson MD; Molyneaux-Francis M; Nagaraja S
    Spine J; 2018 Feb; 18(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 28823940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study.
    Aichmair A; Moser M; Bauer MR; Bachmann E; Snedeker JG; Betz M; Farshad M
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2865-2872. PubMed ID: 28260125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of Insertional Direction of Pedicle Screw on Screw Loosening: A Biomechanical Study on Synthetic Bone Vertebra under a Physiology-like Load.
    Zhan X; Gao F; Yang Y; Tsai TY; Wan Z; Yu Y
    Orthop Surg; 2024 Jun; 16(6):1461-1472. PubMed ID: 38714346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
    Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bone density optimized pedicle screw instrumentation improves screw pull-out force in lumbar vertebrae.
    Caprara S; Fasser MR; Spirig JM; Widmer J; Snedeker JG; Farshad M; Senteler M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Mar; 25(4):464-474. PubMed ID: 34369827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical Comparison of Sacral Fixation Characteristics of Standard S1-Pedicle Screw Fixation versus a Novel Constrained S1-Dual-Screw Anchorage in the S1-Pedicle and S1-Alar Bone.
    Mayer M; Stephan D; Resch H; Augat P; Auffarth A; Blocher M; Ernstbrunner L; Hitzl W; Defossez H; Rouge R; Koller H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Dec; 40(24):1890-7. PubMed ID: 26571158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation of screw fixation options at the cervicothoracic junction: intralamina versus intrapedicular techniques.
    Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Helgeson M; Cooper P; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2612-7. PubMed ID: 19011542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screws improved with cortical bone ratio: a cadaveric study.
    Chou WK; Chien A; Wang JL
    J Orthop Sci; 2014 Nov; 19(6):900-6. PubMed ID: 25100570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical Comparisons of Pull Out Strengths After Pedicle Screw Augmentation with Hydroxyapatite, Calcium Phosphate, or Polymethylmethacrylate in the Cadaveric Spine.
    Yi S; Rim DC; Park SW; Murovic JA; Lim J; Park J
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Jun; 83(6):976-81. PubMed ID: 25769482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
    Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integrating micro CT indices, CT imaging and computational modelling to assess the mechanical performance of fluoride treated bone.
    Sreenivasan D; Watson M; Callon K; Dray M; Das R; Grey A; Cornish J; Fernandez J
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1793-800. PubMed ID: 23993994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pedicle screw reinsertion using previous pilot hole and trajectory does not reduce fixation strength.
    Kang DG; Lehman RA; Wagner SC; Bevevino AJ; Bernstock JD; Gaume RE; Dmitriev AE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(20):1640-7. PubMed ID: 24979143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of screw position on load transfer in lumbar pedicle screws: a non-idealized finite element analysis.
    Newcomb AG; Baek S; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Feb; 20(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 27454197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.
    Wilke HJ; Kaiser D; Volkheimer D; Hackenbroch C; Püschel K; Rauschmann M
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2919-28. PubMed ID: 27405823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
    Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine.
    Paik H; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Kang DG; Lenke LG
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 22480532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
    Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
    Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical analysis of different types of pedicle screw augmentation: a cadaveric and synthetic bone sample study of instrumented vertebral specimens.
    Chao KH; Lai YS; Chen WC; Chang CM; McClean CJ; Fan CY; Chang CH; Lin LC; Cheng CK
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Oct; 35(10):1506-12. PubMed ID: 23669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.