191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29337557)
1. Pair Interaction Energy Decomposition Analysis for Density Functional Theory and Density-Functional Tight-Binding with an Evaluation of Energy Fluctuations in Molecular Dynamics.
Fedorov DG; Kitaura K
J Phys Chem A; 2018 Feb; 122(6):1781-1795. PubMed ID: 29337557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polarization energies in the fragment molecular orbital method.
Fedorov DG
J Comput Chem; 2022 Jun; 43(16):1094-1103. PubMed ID: 35446441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analytic gradient for second order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory with the polarizable continuum model based on the fragment molecular orbital method.
Nagata T; Fedorov DG; Li H; Kitaura K
J Chem Phys; 2012 May; 136(20):204112. PubMed ID: 22667545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Fragment Molecular Orbital Method Based on Long-Range Corrected Density-Functional Tight-Binding.
Vuong VQ; Nishimoto Y; Fedorov DG; Sumpter BG; Niehaus TA; Irle S
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 May; 15(5):3008-3020. PubMed ID: 30998360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytic second derivative of the energy for density functional theory based on the three-body fragment molecular orbital method.
Nakata H; Fedorov DG; Zahariev F; Schmidt MW; Kitaura K; Gordon MS; Nakamura S
J Chem Phys; 2015 Mar; 142(12):124101. PubMed ID: 25833559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large-Scale Quantum-Mechanical Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using Density-Functional Tight-Binding Combined with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method.
Nishimoto Y; Nakata H; Fedorov DG; Irle S
J Phys Chem Lett; 2015 Dec; 6(24):5034-9. PubMed ID: 26623658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The fragment molecular orbital method combined with density-functional tight-binding and the polarizable continuum model.
Nishimoto Y; Fedorov DG
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22047-61. PubMed ID: 27215663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular recognition mechanism of FK506 binding protein: an all-electron fragment molecular orbital study.
Nakanishi I; Fedorov DG; Kitaura K
Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 17387719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Water clusters to nanodrops: a tight-binding density functional study.
Miró P; Cramer CJ
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Feb; 15(6):1837-43. PubMed ID: 23247323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mapping Interaction Energies in Chorismate Mutase with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method.
Pruitt SR; Steinmann C
J Phys Chem A; 2017 Mar; 121(8):1797-1807. PubMed ID: 28177633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of Three-Body Interactions in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Water Demonstrated with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method.
Pruitt SR; Nakata H; Nagata T; Mayes M; Alexeev Y; Fletcher G; Fedorov DG; Kitaura K; Gordon MS
J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Apr; 12(4):1423-35. PubMed ID: 26913837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extending the power of quantum chemistry to large systems with the fragment molecular orbital method.
Fedorov DG; Kitaura K
J Phys Chem A; 2007 Aug; 111(30):6904-14. PubMed ID: 17511437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intermolecular potentials of the silane dimer calculated with Hartree-Fock theory, Møller-Plesset perturbation theory, and density functional theory.
Pai CC; Li AH; Chao SD
J Phys Chem A; 2007 Nov; 111(46):11922-9. PubMed ID: 17963367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The fragment molecular orbital method for geometry optimizations of polypeptides and proteins.
Fedorov DG; Ishida T; Uebayasi M; Kitaura K
J Phys Chem A; 2007 Apr; 111(14):2722-32. PubMed ID: 17388363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive frozen orbital treatment for the fragment molecular orbital method combined with density-functional tight-binding.
Nishimoto Y; Fedorov DG
J Chem Phys; 2018 Feb; 148(6):064115. PubMed ID: 29448787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Van der Waals interactions between hydrocarbon molecules and zeolites: periodic calculations at different levels of theory, from density functional theory to the random phase approximation and Møller-Plesset perturbation theory.
Göltl F; Grüneis A; Bučko T; Hafner J
J Chem Phys; 2012 Sep; 137(11):114111. PubMed ID: 22998253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Body Energy Decomposition Analysis Based on the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method.
Fedorov DG
J Phys Chem A; 2020 Jun; 124(24):4956-4971. PubMed ID: 32447956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved supermolecular second order Møller-Plesset intermolecular interaction energies using time-dependent density functional response theory.
Hesselmann A
J Chem Phys; 2008 Apr; 128(14):144112. PubMed ID: 18412428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accurate calculation and modeling of the adiabatic connection in density functional theory.
Teale AM; Coriani S; Helgaker T
J Chem Phys; 2010 Apr; 132(16):164115. PubMed ID: 20441266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple and efficient dispersion correction to the Hartree-Fock theory (3): A comprehensive performance comparison of HF-Dtq with MP2 and DFT-Ds.
Yoshida T; Hayashi T; Mashima A; Sasahara K; Chuman H
Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2016 Jan; 26(2):589-593. PubMed ID: 26646216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
