682 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29337763)
1. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):110-123. PubMed ID: 28787316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.
Bernstein JGW; Jensen KK; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble JH; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Shih R; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Goupell MJ
J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):101-114. PubMed ID: 34133400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening.
Fathima H; Bhat JS; Pitchaimuthu AN
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3209-3217. PubMed ID: 36695909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanisms of Localization and Speech Perception with Colocated and Spatially Separated Noise and Speech Maskers Under Single-Sided Deafness with a Cochlear Implant.
Dirks C; Nelson PB; Sladen DP; Oxenham AJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1293-1306. PubMed ID: 30870240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of tonotopic matching and spatial cues on segregation of competing speech in simulations of bilateral cochlear implants.
Thomas M; Willis S; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270759. PubMed ID: 35788202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.
Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 31584504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
