184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29338761)
21. Postoperative Outcomes of Total Femur Replacement in Oncologic and Nononcologic Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Gonzalez MR; Inchaustegui ML; Layme J; Ruiz-Arellanos K; Larios F; Pretell-Mazzini J
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Jun; 39(6):1624-1631.e2. PubMed ID: 38061400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
Goff TAJ; Bobak P
Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 28165587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Five-year outcome of proximal femoral endoprosthetic arthroplasty for non-tumour indications.
Grammatopoulos G; Alvand A; Martin H; Whitwell D; Taylor A; Gibbons CL
Bone Joint J; 2016 Nov; 98-B(11):1463-1470. PubMed ID: 27803221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Distal femur and proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis in revision knee arthroplasty: a limb-saving procedure.
Höll S; Schlomberg A; Gosheger G; Dieckmann R; Streitbuerger A; Schulz D; Hardes J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Dec; 20(12):2513-8. PubMed ID: 22392068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcomes and complications following non-oncologic total femoral replacement.
Christ AB; Mendez L; Gausden EB; Blevins JL; Bostrom MP; Sculco PK
Hip Int; 2020 Nov; 30(6):725-730. PubMed ID: 31317783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Complications from the hinged GUEPAR prosthesis after resection of knee tumor. 102 cases].
Mascard E; Anract P; Touchene A; Pouillart P; Tomeno B
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1998 Nov; 84(7):628-37. PubMed ID: 9881409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contemporary failure aetiologies of the primary, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.
Abdel MP; Ledford CK; Kobic A; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD
Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):647-652. PubMed ID: 28455474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What Factors Are Associated With Failure of Compressive Osseointegration Fixation?
Kagan R; Adams J; Schulman C; Laursen R; Espana K; Yoo J; Doung YC; Hayden J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):698-704. PubMed ID: 26926774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications].
Pavelka T; Salášek M; Weisová D
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017; 84(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 28253947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
Sandiford NA; Jameson SS; Wilson MJ; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nonmechanical Revision Indications Portend Repeat Limb-Salvage Failure Following Total Femoral Replacement.
Henderson ER; Keeney BJ; Husson EG; Bernthal NM; Ji T; Pala E; Funovics PT; Groundland JS; Lozano-Calderon S; Puchner S; Zoller SD; Ruggieri P; Windhager R; Guo W; Hornicek FJ; Letson GD; Temple HT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Sep; 102(17):1511-1520. PubMed ID: 32453111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Wang L; Dai Z; Wen T; Li M; Hu Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Feb; 133(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 23124491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Silver-coated modular Megaendoprostheses in salvage revision arthroplasty after periimplant infection with extensive bone loss - a pilot study of 34 patients.
Zajonz D; Birke U; Ghanem M; Prietzel T; Josten C; Roth A; Fakler JKM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Sep; 18(1):383. PubMed ID: 28865425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Total hip arthroplasty in severe segmental femoral bone loss situations: use of a reconstruction modular stem design (JVC IX). Retrospective study of 23 cases.
Bertani A; Helix M; Louis ML; Rochwerger A; Curvale G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 95(7):491-7. PubMed ID: 19833568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA.
Bozic KJ; Kamath AF; Ong K; Lau E; Kurtz S; Chan V; Vail TP; Rubash H; Berry DJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2131-8. PubMed ID: 25467789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Abdel MP; Cottino U; Larson DR; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):873-881. PubMed ID: 28509828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.
Howard JL; Kudera J; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 21368080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of an Artificial Ligament Decreases Hip Dislocation and Improves Limb Function After Total Femoral Prosthetic Replacement Following Femoral Tumor Resection.
Du Z; Tang S; Yang R; Tang X; Ji T; Guo W
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1507-1514. PubMed ID: 29366726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modular proximal femoral replacement in salvage hip surgery for non-neoplastic conditions.
Sewell MD; Hanna SA; Carrington RW; Pollock RC; Skinner JA; Cannon SR; Briggs TW
Acta Orthop Belg; 2010 Aug; 76(4):493-502. PubMed ID: 20973356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
