184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29338761)
41. [Total femur prosthesis in non-oncological patients].
Luengo-Alonso G; Moreno-Beamud JA; Delgado-Díaz E
Acta Ortop Mex; 2021; 35(2):188-192. PubMed ID: 34731921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Total femoral replacement for salvage of periprosthetic fractures.
Clement ND; MacDonald D; Ahmed I; Patton JT; Howie CR
Orthopedics; 2014 Sep; 37(9):e789-95. PubMed ID: 25350621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clinical and radiological outcomes of combined modular prothesis and cortical strut for revision proximal femur in giant cell tumor of bone patients.
Zhang X; Tang X; Li Z; Zhang X; Li F; Tao C; Liu T
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2022 Jan; 30(1):10225536221095202. PubMed ID: 35491561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Safe Positioning for Sexual Intercourse After Proximal Femoral Replacement.
Couch CG; Nicholas RW; Montgomery CO
Orthopedics; 2018 Mar; 41(2):e292-e294. PubMed ID: 28934540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Single-stage revision for fungal peri-prosthetic joint infection: a single-centre experience.
Klatte TO; Kendoff D; Kamath AF; Jonen V; Rueger JM; Frommelt L; Gebauer M; Gehrke T
Bone Joint J; 2014 Apr; 96-B(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 24692616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?
Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Intramedullary total femoral replacement for salvage of the compromised femur associated with hip and knee arthroplasty.
Peters CL; Hickman JM; Erickson J; Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Mallory TH
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16446185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first generation locking plate.
Fulkerson E; Tejwani N; Stuchin S; Egol K
Injury; 2007 Aug; 38(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 17561020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Proximal femoral megaprosthesis for failed total hip arthroplasty.
Shih ST; Wang JW; Hsu CC
Chang Gung Med J; 2007; 30(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 17477032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.
Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Surgical complications and their treatment options in total knee replacement].
Than P; Kránicz J; Bellyei A
Orv Hetil; 2002 Apr; 143(15):771-7. PubMed ID: 11979996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Three Cases of Femoral Stem Failure in Rotating Hinge Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Causes and Surgical Considerations.
Sandiford NA; Phillips JR; Back DL; Toms AD
Clin Orthop Surg; 2018 Jun; 10(2):260-264. PubMed ID: 29854352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mid-term results of previously cemented hip arthroplasties revised with uncemented modular femoral components: a retrospective study.
Duymus TM; Solak Z; Ozturkmen Y; Azboy I; Mutlu S; Caniklioglu M
J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Aug; 10():123. PubMed ID: 26269201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The use of Gamma-irradiated proximal femoral allografts for bone stock reconstruction in complex revision hip arthroplasty.
Nusem I; Morgan DA
Hip Int; 2013; 23(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 23813172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Distal femoral allograft reconstruction for massive osteolytic bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Bezwada HP; Shah AR; Zambito K; Cerynik DL; Johanson NA
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Feb; 21(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 16520214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?
George J; Kwiecien G; Klika AK; Ramanathan D; Bauer TW; Barsoum WK; Higuera CA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jul; 474(7):1619-26. PubMed ID: 26689583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Revision total hip and knee replacement.
Barnett AJ; Toms AD
Clin Geriatr Med; 2012 Aug; 28(3):431-46. PubMed ID: 22840306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Primary arthroplasty in healed osteoarticular allograft in patients with history of primary femoral bone tumors.
Verbeek BM; Kaiser CL; Paulino Pereira NR; Hornicek FJ; Raskin KA; Schwab JH; LozanoCalderón SA
Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 26(4):498-505. PubMed ID: 29113670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
