These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29339025)

  • 1. Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users.
    Fidêncio VLD; Jacob RTS; Tanamati LF; Bucuvic ÉC; Moret ALM
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 29339025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
    Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of a Proposed Clinical Electroacoustic Test Protocol for Personal Digital Modulation Receivers Coupled to Cochlear Implant Sound Processors.
    Nair EL; Sousa R; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28722645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electromagnetic versus electrical coupling of personal frequency modulation (FM) receivers to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Romine D; Musgrave E; Momin S; Huynh C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):927-40. PubMed ID: 24384079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: results in children and adolescents.
    Almeida GFL; Martins MF; Costa LBAD; Costa OAD; Martinho de Carvalho AC
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 30166120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC; Heldner B; Mülder H; Ward E; Vincent B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):409-21. PubMed ID: 19928395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients using a personal digital adaptive radio frequency system.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E; Mills E; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; Marquis F; John A; Hudson M; Peters BR; Lianos L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):714-24. PubMed ID: 24131607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefit and predictive factors for speech perception outcomes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    Chang YS; Hong SH; Kim EY; Choi JE; Chung WH; Cho YS; Moon IJ
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(5):571-577. PubMed ID: 29859680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system.
    Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phrases in noise test (PINT) Brazil: effectiveness of the test in children with hearing loss.
    Jacob RTS; Souza COE; Rosa BC; Santos LGD; Paccola ECM; Alvarenga BG; Lauris JRP
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2021; 87(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 31718997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.
    De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of programming parameters in children with the advanced bionics cochlear implant.
    Baudhuin J; Cadieux J; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Maxson JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):302-12. PubMed ID: 22533974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.
    Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.