BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29339300)

  • 1. Robotic Surgery in Elderly and Very Elderly Gynecologic Cancer Patients.
    Gallotta V; Conte C; D'Indinosante M; Federico A; Biscione A; Vizzielli G; Bottoni C; Carbone MV; Legge F; Uccella S; Ciocchetti P; Russo A; Polidori L; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):872-877. PubMed ID: 29339300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
    Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
    Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy.
    da Costa AG; Borghesi Y; Hudry D; Faes J; Bresson L; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):861-866. PubMed ID: 29337211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients.
    Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study.
    Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Nero C; Costantini B; Lucidi A; Cicero C; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 27666513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
    Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical experience of robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancer.
    Li XL; Du DF; Jiang H
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Apr; 26(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 27667447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.
    Johnson L; Bunn WD; Nguyen L; Rice J; Raj M; Cunningham MJ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 27812904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
    Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes.
    Fanfani F; Restaino S; Gueli Alletti S; Fagotti A; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25982854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer.
    Fagotti A; Vizzielli G; Fanfani F; Gallotta V; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Gueli-Alletti S; Avenia N; Iodice R; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 24325899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic single site radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers.
    Vizza E; Chiofalo B; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Zampa A; Bufalo A; Corrado G
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):e2. PubMed ID: 29185260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Staging for Early Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Matched Control Study.
    Gallotta V; Cicero C; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Petrillo M; Fagotti A; Chiantera V; Costantini B; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):293-298. PubMed ID: 27856387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
    El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.