159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29339570)
1. Comparison of Monte Carlo and analytical dose computations for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Yepes P; Adair A; Grosshans D; Mirkovic D; Poenisch F; Titt U; Wang Q; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045003. PubMed ID: 29339570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric impact of random spot positioning errors in intensity modulated proton therapy plans of small and large volume tumors.
Arjunan M; Krishnan G; Sharma DS; M P N; Patro KC; Thiyagarajan R; Srinivas C; Jalali R
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20201031. PubMed ID: 33529057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a track repeating algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy: clinical cases study.
Yepes PP; Eley JG; Liu A; Mirkovic D; Randeniya S; Titt U; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 61(7):2633-45. PubMed ID: 26961764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the Clinical Impact of Approximations in Analytical Dose Calculations for Proton Therapy.
Schuemann J; Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Moteabbed M; Min CH; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Aug; 92(5):1157-1164. PubMed ID: 26025779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is an analytical dose engine sufficient for intensity modulated proton therapy in lung cancer?
Teoh S; Fiorini F; George B; Vallis KA; Van den Heuvel F
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190583. PubMed ID: 31696729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation and application of a fast Monte Carlo algorithm for assessing the clinical impact of approximations in analytical dose calculations for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Souris K; Li S; Kang M; Barragan Montero AM; Janssens G; Lin A; Garver E; Ainsley C; Taylor P; Xiao Y; Lin L
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5631-5642. PubMed ID: 30295950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Density overwrites of internal tumor volumes in intensity modulated proton therapy plans for mobile lung tumors.
Botas P; Grassberger C; Sharp G; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035023. PubMed ID: 29219119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo dose verification of VMAT treatment plans using Elekta Agility 160-leaf MLC.
Onizuka R; Araki F; Ohno T
Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():22-31. PubMed ID: 30278982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study.
Giantsoudi D; Schuemann J; Jia X; Dowdell S; Jiang S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2257-69. PubMed ID: 25715661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A GPU-accelerated and Monte Carlo-based intensity modulated proton therapy optimization system.
Ma J; Beltran C; Seum Wan Chan Tseung H; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121707. PubMed ID: 25471954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical Note: Dosimetric evaluation of Monte Carlo algorithm in iPlan for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for lung cancer patients using RTOG 0813 parameters.
Pokhrel D; Badkul R; Jiang H; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5058. PubMed ID: 25679161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of dose perturbations for metal stent in photon and proton radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lee B; Cho S; Park HC; Kang SW; Kim JS; Chung JB
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 35842636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A track repeating algorithm for intensity modulated carbon ion therapy.
Wang Q; Adair A; Deng Y; Chen H; Moyers M; Lin J; Yepes P
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(9):095026. PubMed ID: 30884469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
