1027 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29340344)
1. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Cantilever Length and Implant Inclination on the Stress Distribution of Mandibular Prosthetic Restorations Constructed from Monolithic Zirconia Ceramic.
Durkan R; Oyar P; Deste G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 31923295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of short implants placed in the posterior region on tilted implants in the 'All-On-Four' treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element stress analysis.
Özil E; Özkan N; Keskin M
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Jul; 27(9):1171-1180. PubMed ID: 37450571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparative Analysis on Two Types of Oral Implants, Bone-Level and Tissue-Level, with Different Cantilever Lengths of Fixed Prosthesis.
Mosavar A; Nili M; Hashemi SR; Kadkhodaei M
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 26(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 26662575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of the design of a mandibular implant-supported zirconia prosthesis on stress distribution.
Oyar P; Durkan R; Deste G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):502.e1-502.e11. PubMed ID: 32893017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gürbüz A; Güçlü ZB; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Aug; 67(4):307-315. PubMed ID: 35587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical Stress Analysis of Different Configurations of the All-on-4 Concept in Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Study.
Santana LCL; Guastaldi FPS; Idogava HT; Noritomi PY; De Foggi CC; Vaz LG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 33600526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Implant Inclination and Prosthetic Abutment Type on the Biomechanics of Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures.
Poletto-Neto V; Tretto PHW; Zen BM; Bacchi A; Dos Santos MBF
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):343-350. PubMed ID: 31429636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of stresses in monoblock tilted implants and conventional angled multiunit abutment-implant connection systems in the all-on-four procedure.
Zincir ÖÖ; Parlar A
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):646. PubMed ID: 34915864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overdenture retaining bar stress distribution: a finite-element analysis.
Caetano CR; Mesquita MF; Consani RL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Dos Santos MB
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25645607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress Distribution on the Prosthetic Screws in the All-on-4 Concept: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Oh JH; Kim YS; Lim JY; Choi BH
J Oral Implantol; 2020 Feb; 46(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31647687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite Element Stress Analysis of Applied Forces to Implants and Supporting Tissues Using the "All-on-Four" Concept with Different Occlusal Schemes.
Türker N; Büyükkaplan US; Sadowsky SJ; Özarslan MM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 30515911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysis.
Deste G; Durkan R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):456-463. PubMed ID: 32246650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
