BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29340969)

  • 1. On the predictive validity of various corpus-based frequency norms in L2 English lexical processing.
    Chen X; Dong Y; Yu X
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 29340969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
    Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proficiency versus lexical processing efficiency as a measure of L2 lexical quality: Individual differences in word-frequency effects in L2 visual word recognition.
    Baek H; Lee Y; Choi W
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Nov; 51(8):1858-1869. PubMed ID: 37707723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who's in control? Proficiency and L1 influence on L2 processing.
    Elston-Güttler KE; Paulmann S; Kotz SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1593-610. PubMed ID: 16269099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexico-syntactic interactions during the processing of temporally ambiguous L2 relative clauses: An eye-tracking study with intermediate and advanced Portuguese-English bilinguals.
    Soares AP; Oliveira H; Ferreira M; Comesaña M; Macedo AF; Ferré P; Acuña-Fariña C; Hernández-Cabrera J; Fraga I
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216779. PubMed ID: 31141531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphological Decomposition in L2 Arabic: A Masked Priming Study.
    Foote R; Qasem M; Trentman E
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2020 Apr; 49(2):291-317. PubMed ID: 32008140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introducing LexTALE: a quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English.
    Lemhöfer K; Broersma M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):325-43. PubMed ID: 21898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proficiency and sentence constraint effects on second language word learning.
    Ma T; Chen B; Lu C; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():116-22. PubMed ID: 26094128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contributions of semantic and contextual diversity to the word frequency effect in L2 lexical access.
    Hamrick P; Pandža NB
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Mar; 74(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31580087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Segmentation by lexical subtraction in Hungarian speakers of second-language English.
    White L; Melhorn JF; Mattys SL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):544-54. PubMed ID: 19591079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.
    Brysbaert M; New B
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 19897807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing advantage for emotional words in bilingual speakers.
    Ponari M; Rodríguez-Cuadrado S; Vinson D; Fox N; Costa A; Vigliocco G
    Emotion; 2015 Oct; 15(5):644-52. PubMed ID: 25893450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective age of acquisition norms for 1604 English words by Spanish L2 speakers of English and their relationship with lexico-semantic, affective, sociolinguistic and proficiency variables.
    Rodriguez-Cuadrado S; Hinojosa JA; Guasch M; Romero-Rivas C; Sabater L; Suárez-Coalla P; Ferré P
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4437-4454. PubMed ID: 36477592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of language proficiency on L2 English learners' processing of morphologically complex words: Evidence from masked transposed letter priming.
    Zeng T; Han B; Zhai M; Mu Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jun; 704():84-88. PubMed ID: 30943429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic spatial organization of the occipito-temporal word form area for second language processing.
    Gao Y; Sun Y; Lu C; Ding G; Guo T; Malins JG; Booth JR; Peng D; Liu L
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():20-28. PubMed ID: 28610849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adolescent language outcomes in a complex trilingual context: When typical does not mean unproblematic.
    Thordardottir E
    J Commun Disord; 2021; 89():106060. PubMed ID: 33291036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spoken Language Activation Alters Subsequent Sign Language Activation in L2 Learners of American Sign Language.
    Williams JT; Newman SD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):211-225. PubMed ID: 27112154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender agreement violations modulate beta oscillatory dynamics during sentence comprehension: A comparison of second language learners and native speakers.
    Lewis AG; Lemhӧfer K; Schoffelen JM; Schriefers H
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():254-272. PubMed ID: 27350390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners.
    Dowens MG; Vergara M; Barber HA; Carreiras M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1870-87. PubMed ID: 19580390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sense-aware lexical sophistication indices and their relationship to second language writing quality.
    Lu X; Hu R
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1444-1460. PubMed ID: 34405390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.