250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29341101)
1. An overview of confounding. Part 2: how to identify it and special situations.
Howards PP
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):400-406. PubMed ID: 29341101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An overview of confounding. Part 1: the concept and how to address it.
Howards PP
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):394-399. PubMed ID: 29341103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Information bias in epidemiological studies with a special focus on obstetrics and gynecology.
Kesmodel US
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):417-423. PubMed ID: 29453880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Causality and confounding in epidemiology].
Stang A
Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):884-7. PubMed ID: 22193897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity analysis for mistakenly adjusting for mediators in estimating total effect in observational studies.
Wang T; Li H; Su P; Yu Y; Sun X; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Xue F
BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e015640. PubMed ID: 29162569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias.
Richiardi L; Bellocco R; Zugna D
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 42(5):1511-9. PubMed ID: 24019424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs): an aid to assess confounding in dental research.
Merchant AT; Pitiphat W
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2002 Dec; 30(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 12453109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misclassification of the mediator matters when estimating indirect effects.
Blakely T; McKenzie S; Carter K
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2013 May; 67(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 23386673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confounding, causality, and confusion: the role of intermediate variables in interpreting observational studies in obstetrics.
Ananth CV; Schisterman EF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 217(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 28427805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fixed effects analysis of repeated measures data.
Gunasekara FI; Richardson K; Carter K; Blakely T
Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 43(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 24366487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confounding in health research.
Greenland S; Morgenstern H
Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():189-212. PubMed ID: 11274518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies.
Groenwold RH; Hak E; Hoes AW
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18619797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias Due to Confounders for the Exposure-Competing Risk Relationship.
Lesko CR; Lau B
Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 27748680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias Analysis for Uncontrolled Confounding in the Health Sciences.
Arah OA
Annu Rev Public Health; 2017 Mar; 38():23-38. PubMed ID: 28125388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carryover Effects in Sibling Comparison Designs.
Sjölander A; Frisell T; Kuja-Halkola R; Öberg S; Zetterqvist J
Epidemiology; 2016 Nov; 27(6):852-8. PubMed ID: 27488059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Covariate balance for no confounding in the sufficient-cause model.
Suzuki E; Tsuda T; Yamamoto E
Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):48-53.e2. PubMed ID: 29241736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in control of confounding].
Xiang R; Dai WJ; Xiong Y; Wu X; Yang YF; Wang L; Dai ZH; Li J; Liu AZ
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1035-8. PubMed ID: 27453119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of estimators from self-controlled case series, case-crossover design, and sequence symmetry analysis for pharmacoepidemiological studies.
Takeuchi Y; Shinozaki T; Matsuyama Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29310575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
