These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29342297)

  • 1. AN EXACT GOODNESS-OF-FIT TEST BASED ON THE OCCUPANCY PROBLEMS TO STUDY ZERO-INFLATION AND ZERO-DEFLATION IN BIOLOGICAL DOSIMETRY DATA.
    Fernández-Fontelo A; Puig P; Ainsbury EA; Higueras M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jun; 179(4):317-326. PubMed ID: 29342297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A note on Poisson goodness-of-fit tests for ionizing radiation induced chromosomal aberration samples.
    Higueras M; González JE; Di Giorgio M; Barquinero JF
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2018 Jul; 94(7):656-663. PubMed ID: 29775402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of micronucleus assays and dicentric plus ring chromosomes for dose assessment in particular cases of partial-body exposure.
    Mendes ME; Mendonça JCG; Barquinero JF; Higueras M; Gonzalez JE; Andrade AMG; Silva LM; Nascimento AMS; Lima JCF; Silva JCG; Hwang S; Melo AMMA; Santos N; Lima FF
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2019 Aug; 95(8):1058-1071. PubMed ID: 31008687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zero-inflated regression models for radiation-induced chromosome aberration data: A comparative study.
    Oliveira M; Einbeck J; Higueras M; Ainsbury E; Puig P; Rothkamm K
    Biom J; 2016 Mar; 58(2):259-79. PubMed ID: 26461836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of semi-automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes after simulation of three different irradiation scenarios.
    Romm H; Ainsbury E; Barnard S; Barrios L; Barquinero JF; Beinke C; Deperas M; Gregoire E; Koivistoinen A; Lindholm C; Moquet J; Oestreicher U; Puig R; Rothkamm K; Sommer S; Thierens H; Vandersickel V; Vral A; Wojcik A
    Health Phys; 2014 Jun; 106(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 24776911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some goodness-of-fit methods for the Poisson plus added zeros distribution.
    el-Shaarawi AH
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1985 May; 49(5):1304-6. PubMed ID: 4004245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological dosimetry in simulated in vitro partial irradiations.
    Barquinero JF; Barrios L; Caballín MR; Miró R; Ribas M; Egozcue J
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1997 Apr; 71(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 9154147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Zero-inflated Conway-Maxwell Poisson Distribution to Analyze Discrete Data.
    Sim SZ; Gupta RC; Ong SH
    Int J Biostat; 2018 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29306919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bootstrap tests for overdispersion in a zero-inflated Poisson regression model.
    Jung BC; Jhun M; Lee JW
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):626-8; discussion 628-9. PubMed ID: 16011713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
    Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Poisson goodness-of-fit tests for radiation-induced chromosome aberrations.
    Merkle W
    Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med; 1981 Dec; 40(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 6978305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical modelling of Poisson/log normal data.
    Miller G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 17223632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromosomal biodosimetry by unfolding a mixed Poisson distribution: a generalized model.
    Sasaki MS
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Feb; 79(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 12569012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple method to irradiate blood cells in vitro with radon gas.
    Hamza VZ; Kumar PR; Jeevanram RK; Santanam R; Danalaksmi B; Mohankumar MN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 18319520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical modelling of falls count data with excess zeros.
    Khan A; Ullah S; Nitz J
    Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 17(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 21653652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using exact Poisson likelihood functions in Bayesian interpretation of counting measurements.
    Miller G; Martz HF; Little TT; Guilmette R
    Health Phys; 2002 Oct; 83(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 12240726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cytogenetic dosimetry: dose-effect curves and a methodological comparison].
    Catena C; Conti D; Del Nero A; Righi E
    Med Lav; 1993; 84(2):133-46. PubMed ID: 8316144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of α-particle-induced chromosomal aberrations by chemically-induced PCC. Elaboration of dose-effect curves.
    Puig R; Pujol M; Barrios L; Caballín MR; Barquinero JF
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2016 Sep; 92(9):493-501. PubMed ID: 27454163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of score tests for zero-inflation in count data.
    Lee AH; Xiang L; Fung WK
    Stat Med; 2004 Sep; 23(17):2757-69. PubMed ID: 15316956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construction of dose response calibration curves for dicentrics and micronuclei for X radiation in a Serbian population.
    Pajic J; Rakic B; Jovicic D; Milovanovic A
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Oct; 773():23-8. PubMed ID: 25308702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.