These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29342717)

  • 1. A usage-based cognitive linguistic (re-)interpretation of priming evidence.
    Günther F
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e291. PubMed ID: 29342717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moving beyond the priming of single-language sentences: A proposal for a comprehensive model to account for linguistic representation in bilinguals.
    Kootstra GJ; Rossi E
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e297. PubMed ID: 29342728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Horses for courses: When acceptability judgments are more suitable than structural priming (and vice versa).
    Ambridge B
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e284. PubMed ID: 29342711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural priming is a useful but imperfect technique for studying all linguistic representations, including those of pragmatics.
    Rees A; Bott L
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e307. PubMed ID: 29342735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What structural priming can and cannot reveal.
    Koring L; Reuland E
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e298. PubMed ID: 29342725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the nature of structure in structural priming.
    Kwon N; Lee Y
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e299. PubMed ID: 29342726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Priming is swell, but it's far from simple.
    Ziegler J; Snedeker J; Wittenberg E
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e312. PubMed ID: 29342737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural priming is not a Royal Road to representations.
    Meyer AS
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e305. PubMed ID: 29342734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Considering experimental and observational evidence of priming together, syntax doesn't look so autonomous.
    Lester NA; Du Bois JW; Gries ST; Moscoso Del Prado Martín F
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e300. PubMed ID: 29342729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. If priming is graded rather than all-or-none, can reactivating abstract structures be the underlying mechanism?
    Feldman LB; Milin P
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e287. PubMed ID: 29342716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Setting the empirical record straight: Acceptability judgments appear to be reliable, robust, and replicable.
    Sprouse J; Almeida D
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e311. PubMed ID: 29342740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Converging on a theory of language through multiple methods.
    González-Márquez M; Feist MI; Ströbel L
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e290. PubMed ID: 29342719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Syntactic priming in spoken production: linguistic and temporal interference.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; Stewart AJ; McLean JF
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Dec; 28(8):1297-302. PubMed ID: 11219957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Analysis of Metaphor: To What Extent Can the Theory of Lexical Priming Help Our Understanding of Metaphor Usage and Comprehension?
    Patterson KJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):237-58. PubMed ID: 25476508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The logic of syntactic priming and acceptability judgments.
    Gaston P; Huang N; Phillips C
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e289. PubMed ID: 29342718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural priming can inform syntactic analyses of partially grammaticalized constructions.
    Francis EJ
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e288. PubMed ID: 29342713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual effects of linguistic category priming: the Stapel and Semin (2007) paradigm revisited in twelve experiments.
    IJzerman H; Regenberg NF; Saddlemyer J; Koole SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():23-9. PubMed ID: 25703607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust.
    Mahowald K; James A; Futrell R; Gibson E
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e302. PubMed ID: 29342730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension.
    Arai M; van Gompel RP; Scheepers C
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 May; 54(3):218-50. PubMed ID: 16973144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The syntax of priming.
    O'Grady W
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e306. PubMed ID: 29342733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.