213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29343205)
1. A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Luo Q; Luo L; Tang L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533034617742311. PubMed ID: 29343205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
Liu B; Gao S; Li S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PET-CT versus MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
He T; Sun J; Wu J; Wang H; Liang C; Wang H; Li S; Su S
Microsc Res Tech; 2022 May; 85(5):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 34981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and endometrial cancer: clinical and pathological factors influencing it.
Nogami Y; Banno K; Irie H; Iida M; Kisu I; Masugi Y; Tanaka K; Tominaga E; Okuda S; Murakami K; Aoki D
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25368102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Selman TJ; Mann C; Zamora J; Appleyard TL; Khan K
CMAJ; 2008 Mar; 178(7):855-62. PubMed ID: 18362381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic performance of PET/CT scans for the detection of para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
Yu W; Kou C; Bai W; Yu X; Duan R; Zhu B; Li Y; Hua W; Ren X; Yang Y
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220080. PubMed ID: 31318962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.
Li Z; Gao Y; Gong H; Feng W; Ma Q; Li J; Lu X; Wang X; Lei J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 May; 57(5):1392-1403. PubMed ID: 36054564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct comparison of choline PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer.
Huang SM; Yin L; Yue JL; Li YF; Yang Y; Lin ZC
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(50):e13344. PubMed ID: 30557983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.
Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y
Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging evaluation of para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical cancer.
Zhu M; Zhuo Q; Liu W; Guan C; Zuo Y
Acta Radiol; 2023 Sep; 64(9):2611-2617. PubMed ID: 37321631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Values of 8 Different Imaging Modalities for Preoperative Detection of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.
Kim K; Shim SR; Kim SJ
Am J Clin Oncol; 2021 Jul; 44(7):331-339. PubMed ID: 33979099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic values of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT, CT, and US for Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Thyroid Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Kim K; Shim SR; Lee SW; Kim SJ
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20201076. PubMed ID: 33595337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer.
Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limited additional value of cervical ultrasonography over a negative 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Goense L; Meziani J; van Rossum PSN; Wessels FJ; Meijer GJ; Lam MGEH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):645-651. PubMed ID: 29672463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which is better for predicting pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer: Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography or a sentinel node biopsy? A retrospective observational study.
Tanaka T; Sasaki S; Tsuchihashi H; Terai Y; Yamamoto K; Yamada T; Ohmichi M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0410. PubMed ID: 29668599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential diagnosis between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes using DW-MRI: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Zhou M; Lu B; Lv G; Tang Q; Zhu J; Li J; Shi K
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2015 Jun; 141(6):1119-30. PubMed ID: 25515409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes to predict pelvic lymphatic metastasis in cervical cancer: an integrated PET-IVIM MRI study.
Xu C; Li X; Shi Y; Wang B; Sun H
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Mar; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 32143736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlating Quantitative Para-Aortic Lymph Node Computed Tomography Parameters With Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Cervical Cancer Staging: Possible Solution for Resource Constrained Countries.
D'Cunha P; Albuquerque K; Xi Y; Pinho DF
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):551-559. PubMed ID: 35405734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Xiao M; Yan B; Li Y; Lu J; Qiang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1405-1418. PubMed ID: 31776741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
