218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29343303)
1. Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang Y; Chen Q; Wang J; Wu X; Duan Y; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Cheng B
Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):45. PubMed ID: 29343303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Li SY; Zhou W; Shi L; Ding Z; Yao J; Jiang YP; Gao L; Jiang H; Jin ZD; Wang KX
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Wet suction technique (WEST)": a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions.
Attam R; Arain MA; Bloechl SJ; Trikudanathan G; Munigala S; Bakman Y; Singh M; Wallace T; Henderson JB; Catalano MF; Guda NM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015; 81(6):1401-7. PubMed ID: 25733127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wet- versus dry-suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Wang Y; Wang RH; Ding Z; Tan SY; Chen Q; Duan YQ; Zhu LR; Cao JW; Wang J; Shi G; Wu XL; Wang JL; Zhao YC; Tang SJ; Cheng B
Endoscopy; 2020 Nov; 52(11):995-1003. PubMed ID: 32413915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Wet Suction Technique Enhances the Diagnostic Efficacy and Aspirate Quality of EUS-FNA for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China.
Chen D; Ren Y; Chen S; Jin Y; Xie H; Yu L; Peng K; Xia Y; Pan D; Lu J; Lu L; Wan X; Hu D; Li B
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Apr; 57(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 35389928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between modified wet suction and dry suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions.
Tong T; Tian L; Deng M; Liu Y; Yang Y; Yin H; Long X; Pan S; Yang Z; Luo W; Nie K; Meng X; Xiao M; Wu X; Zhang C; Wang X
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jun; 36(6):1663-1669. PubMed ID: 33295070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Abe Y; Kawakami H; Oba K; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Isayama H; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Nakashima M; Yamamoto N; Kuwatani M; Mitsuhashi T; Hasegawa T; Hirose Y; Yamada T; Tanaka M; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):837-844.e1. PubMed ID: 25936452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial.
Wani S; Early D; Kunkel J; Leathersich A; Hovis CE; Hollander TG; Kohlmeier C; Zelenka C; Azar R; Edmundowicz S; Collins B; Liu J; Hall M; Mullady D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 22695205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of wet-heparinized suction on the quality of mediastinal solid tumor specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a retrospective study from a single center.
Xu B; Lu Q; Fang R; Dai X; Xu H; Ding X; Gui H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2023 Jun; 23(1):208. PubMed ID: 37316772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mediastinal granular cell tumor diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration via a modified technique based on wet suction: A case report and literature review.
Guo Y; Ding X; Liu H; Hou F; Jiang Y; Tian Z
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jul; 49(7):E273-E276. PubMed ID: 33527755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and multidisciplinary approach in the management of abdominal or mediastinal mass.
Del Vecchio Blanco G; Coppola M; Mannisi E; Bevivino G; Formica V; Portarena I; Romeo S; Sileri P; Roselli M; Pallone F; Paoluzi OA
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1045-51. PubMed ID: 26011232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
