174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29344821)
1. Resistance of four fixation techniques used to treat subcondylar fractures.
Cavalieri-Pereira L; Spagnol G; Sverzut CE; de Moraes M; Trivellato AE
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 29344821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of different types of rigid internal fixation techniques for subcondylar fractures.
Tominaga K; Habu M; Khanal A; Mimori Y; Yoshioka I; Fukuda J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1510-6. PubMed ID: 16982310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In Vitro Mechanical Analysis of Different Techniques of Internal Fixation of Combined Mandibular Angle and Body Fractures.
de Medeiros RC; Sigua EA; Navarro P; Olate S; Albergaria Barbosa JR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):778-85. PubMed ID: 26701138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development plates for stable internal fixation: Study of mechanical resistance in simulated fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Celegatti Filho TS; Rodrigues DC; Lauria A; Moreira RW; Consani S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):158-61. PubMed ID: 25439088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element evaluation of three methods of stable fixation of condyle base fractures.
de Jesus GP; Vaz LG; Gabrielli MF; Passeri LA; V Oliveira T; Noritomi PY; Jürgens P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1251-6. PubMed ID: 25124390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative in vitro mechanical evaluation of techniques using a 2.0 mm locking fixation system for simulated fractures of the mandibular body.
de Medeiros RC; de Moura AL; Sawazaki R; Fernandes Moreira RW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 25573304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the Biomechanical Performance of 5 Plating Techniques in Fixation of Mandibular Subcondylar Fracture Using Finite Element Analysis.
Darwich MA; Albogha MH; Abdelmajeed A; Darwich K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):794.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26706490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vitro comparison of mechanical resistance between two straight plates and a Y-plate for fixation of mandibular condyle fractures.
de Souza GM; Rodrigues DC; Celegatti Filho TS; Moreira RWF; Falci SGM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 46(1):168-172. PubMed ID: 29208487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of the mechanical resistance of 2 separate plates and 2 overlaid plates used in the fixation of the mandibular condyle: an in vitro study.
Gealh WC; Costa JV; Ferreira GM; Iwaki Filho L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):738-43. PubMed ID: 19304028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible.
Hakim SG; Wolf M; Wendlandt R; Kimmerle H; Sieg P; Jacobsen HC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24629455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoral external oblique ridge compared with transbuccal lateral cortical plate fixation for the treatment of fractures of the mandibular angle: prospective randomised trial.
Laverick S; Siddappa P; Wong H; Patel P; Jones DC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 50(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 22421389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioabsorbable plates versus metal miniplate systems for use in endoscope-assisted open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures.
Kim DY; Sung IY; Cho YC; Park EJ; Son JH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 46(3):413-417. PubMed ID: 29395992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are Biodegradable Plates Applicable in Endoscope-Assisted Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Subcondyle Fractures?
Son JH; Ha J; Cho YC; Sung IY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 75(8):1706-1715. PubMed ID: 28453951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Alternative Location for Fixation of Subcondylar Fractures With 2 Resorbable Plates.
Hao X; Lv K
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 34(2):757-758. PubMed ID: 36138547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A computer study of biodegradable plates for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Tams J; Van Loon JP; Otten B; Bos RR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 59(4):404-7; discussion 407-8. PubMed ID: 11289171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fixation of subcondylar fractures of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial comparing one trapezoidal plate with two miniplates.
Adhikari M; Bhatt K; Yadav R; Mandal J; Bhutia O; Roychoudhury A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 50(6):756-762. PubMed ID: 33280989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical study of the Delta plate and the TriLock Delta condyle trauma plate.
Haim D; Müller A; Leonhardt H; Nowak A; Richter G; Lauer G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Oct; 69(10):2619-25. PubMed ID: 21474224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical and photoelastic analysis of four different fixation methods for mandibular body fractures.
Rodrigues DC; Falci SG; Lauria A; Marchiori ÉC; Moreira RW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 25596966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "A" shape plate for open rigid internal fixation of mandible condyle neck fracture.
Kozakiewicz M; Swiniarski J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 24359864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
