These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29344821)

  • 21. [Experimental studies of the biomechanical stability of different miniplate configurations for the mandibular angle].
    Schierle HP; Schmelzeisen R; Rahn B
    Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1996; 41():166-70. PubMed ID: 8755434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The need for rigid fixation of combined parasymphyseal and bilateral subcondylar fractures.
    Wheatley MJ; Meltzer TR
    J Craniomaxillofac Trauma; 1997; 3(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11951271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Three Different Osteosynthesis Methods for Mandibular Angle Fractures: Vertical Load Test.
    Pereira-Filho VA; Oliveira LF; Reis JM; Gabrielli MA; Neto RS; Monnazzi MS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):1770-1773. PubMed ID: 27648657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Osteosynthesis of subcondylar fractures using a rectangular 3-dimensional stabilization plate].
    Wilk A; Biotchane I; Rosenstiel M; Charles X; Meyer C
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1997 Nov; 98 Suppl 1():40-4. PubMed ID: 9471693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Repair of mandibular fractures using the 2.0 mm system. A review.
    Klotch DW; Gal RL
    J Craniomaxillofac Trauma; 1995; 1(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11951441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.
    Vajgel A; Camargo IB; Willmersdorf RB; de Melo TM; Laureano Filho JR; Vasconcellos RJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 23351762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques.
    Haug RH; Fattahi TT; Goltz M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 59(10):1199-210. PubMed ID: 11573182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lag screw fixation of mandibular fractures.
    Ellis E
    J Craniomaxillofac Trauma; 1997; 3(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 11951267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of fracture healing and subimplant bone response following fixation with a locking miniplate and screw system for mandibular angle fractures in a sheep model.
    Poon CC; Verco S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 23374732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Which fixation methods are better between three-dimensional anatomical plate and two miniplates for the mandibular subcondylar fracture open treatment?
    Sukegawa S; Kanno T; Masui M; Sukegawa-Takahashi Y; Kishimoto T; Sato A; Furuki Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 47(5):771-777. PubMed ID: 30770259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A computer study of fracture mobility and strain on biodegradable plates used for fixation of mandibular fractures.
    Tams J; Otten B; van Loon JP; Bos RR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Aug; 57(8):973-81; discussion 981-2. PubMed ID: 10437725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
    Singh V; Kumar I; Bhagol A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21194892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
    Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Small and large titanium plates are equally effective for treating mandible fractures.
    Bouloux GF; Chen S; Threadgill JM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1613-21. PubMed ID: 22698293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fractographic analysis of 2.0-mm plates with a screw locking system in simulated fractures of the mandibular body.
    de Medeiros RC; Lauria de Moura A; Rodrigues DC; Menezes Mendes MB; Sawazaki R; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 24656954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hardware removal rates for mandibular angle fractures: comparing the 8-hole strut and champy plates.
    Moore E; Bayrak S; Moody M; Key JM; Vural E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 24(1):163-5. PubMed ID: 23348277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures - linea obliqua plate versus grid plate.
    Höfer SH; Ha L; Ballon A; Sader R; Landes C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):807-11. PubMed ID: 22483950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques for fixing mandibular angle fractures: the introduction of a new 3D plate approach.
    Kalfarentzos EF; Deligianni D; Mitros G; Tyllianakis M
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 13(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 19636597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Different Fixation Types Used in Unilateral Mandibular Condylar Fractures: An In Vivo Study With New Biomechanical Model.
    Çimen E; Önder ME; Cambazoğlu M; Birant E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 27(5):1277-81. PubMed ID: 27315307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-dimensional v/s standard titanium miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures--a randomized clinical study.
    Sehgal S; Ramanujam L; Prasad K; Krishnappa R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24780350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.