178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29344892)
1. Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model to Predict Glioma Growth: Methodological Details.
Hormuth DA; Eldridge SL; Weis JA; Miga MI; Yankeelov TE
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1711():225-241. PubMed ID: 29344892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biophysical Modeling of In Vivo Glioma Response After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in a Murine Model of Brain Cancer.
Hormuth DA; Weis JA; Barnes SL; Miga MI; Quaranta V; Yankeelov TE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Apr; 100(5):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 29398129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calibrating a Predictive Model of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis with Quantitative MRI.
Hormuth DA; Jarrett AM; Feng X; Yankeelov TE
Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1539-1551. PubMed ID: 30963385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brain glioma growth model using reaction-diffusion equation with viscous stress tensor on brain MR images.
Yuan J; Liu L
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 26518060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early detection of human glioma sphere xenografts in mouse brain using diffusion MRI at 14.1 T.
Porcari P; Hegi ME; Lei H; Hamou MF; Vassallo I; Capuani S; Gruetter R; Mlynarik V
NMR Biomed; 2016 Nov; 29(11):1577-1589. PubMed ID: 27717037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model that incorporates intra-tumoural heterogeneity to predict
Hormuth DA; Weis JA; Barnes SL; Miga MI; Rericha EC; Quaranta V; Yankeelov TE
J R Soc Interface; 2017 Mar; 14(128):. PubMed ID: 28330985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A combined diffusion tensor imaging and Ki-67 labeling index study for evaluating the extent of tumor infiltration using the F98 rat glioma model.
Wang K; Ha T; Chen X; Li S; Ai L; Ma J; Dai J
J Neurooncol; 2018 Apr; 137(2):259-268. PubMed ID: 29294232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging for Grading and Molecular Characterization of Glioma.
Chung C; Metser U; Ménard C
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jul; 25(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 26050586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance analysis of malignant transformation in recurrent glioma.
Jalbert LE; Neill E; Phillips JJ; Lupo JM; Olson MP; Molinaro AM; Berger MS; Chang SM; Nelson SJ
Neuro Oncol; 2016 Aug; 18(8):1169-79. PubMed ID: 26911151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting in vivo glioma growth with the reaction diffusion equation constrained by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data.
Hormuth DA; Weis JA; Barnes SL; Miga MI; Rericha EC; Quaranta V; Yankeelov TE
Phys Biol; 2015 Jun; 12(4):046006. PubMed ID: 26040472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Personalized image-based tumor growth prediction in a convection-diffusion-reaction model.
Meghdadi N; Soltani M; Niroomand-Oscuii H; Yamani N
Acta Neurol Belg; 2020 Feb; 120(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 30019255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative multi-modal MR imaging as a non-invasive prognostic tool for patients with recurrent low-grade glioma.
Neill E; Luks T; Dayal M; Phillips JJ; Perry A; Jalbert LE; Cha S; Molinaro A; Chang SM; Nelson SJ
J Neurooncol; 2017 Mar; 132(1):171-179. PubMed ID: 28124178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fusion based Glioma brain tumor detection and segmentation using ANFIS classification.
Selvapandian A; Manivannan K
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Nov; 166():33-38. PubMed ID: 30415716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling of glioma growth using modified reaction-diffusion equation on brain MR images.
Zhang Y; Liu PX; Hou W
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Dec; 227():107233. PubMed ID: 36375418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian Inference of Tissue Heterogeneity for Individualized Prediction of Glioma Growth.
Liang B; Tan J; Lozenski L; Hormuth DA; Yankeelov TE; Villa U; Faghihi D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2023 Oct; 42(10):2865-2875. PubMed ID: 37058375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Glioma Response to Radiotherapy Using Multiple MRI Biomarkers with Manual and Semiautomated Segmentation Algorithms.
Yu Y; Lee DH; Peng SL; Zhang K; Zhang Y; Jiang S; Zhao X; Heo HY; Wang X; Chen M; Lu H; Li H; Zhou J
J Neuroimaging; 2016 Nov; 26(6):626-634. PubMed ID: 27128445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Mathematical modeling of low-grade glioma].
Mandonnet E
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2011 Jan; 195(1):23-34; discussion 34-6. PubMed ID: 22039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative correlational study of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound imaging and magnetic resonance imaging of glioma and early response to radiotherapy in a rat model.
Yang C; Lee DH; Mangraviti A; Su L; Zhang K; Zhang Y; Zhang B; Li W; Tyler B; Wong J; Wang KK; Velarde E; Zhou J; Ding K
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4762-72. PubMed ID: 26233204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-brain amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in glioma patients using low-power steady-state pulsed chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 7T.
Heo HY; Jones CK; Hua J; Yadav N; Agarwal S; Zhou J; van Zijl PC; Pillai JJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 26663561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Different Post-Processing Algorithms for Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas.
Kudo K; Uwano I; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nakamura H; Fujima N; Yamashita F; Goodwin J; Higuchi S; Sasaki M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 16(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27646457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]