These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29344973)

  • 1. Use of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for Assessment of the Efficacy of Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
    Rosič M; Žegura B; Vadnjal Đonlagić S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1929-1935. PubMed ID: 29344973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography to confirm tubal occlusion after Essure® placement as treatment for hydrosalpinges.
    Dreyer K; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Apr; 30(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 25682307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
    Ludwin I; Ludwin A; Wiechec M; Nocun A; Banas T; Basta P; Pitynski K
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hysteroscopic Sterilization Device Follow-Up Rate: Hysterosalpingogram Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound.
    Jeirath N; Basinski CM; Hammond MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 29289623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; Kleiman-Broeze KA; Traas MAF; Muijsers GJJM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; van Oostwaard MF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Peters HE; Lier MCI; Lambalk CB; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Stoker J; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast infusion sonography in the post-Essure setting.
    Connor V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 18262145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast infusion sonography to assess microinsert placement and tubal occlusion after Essure.
    Connor VF
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1791-3. PubMed ID: 16650420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?
    Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Johns DA; Luciano AA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 204(1):79.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21187197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography versus hysterosalpingography during fertility work-up: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.
    Kamphuis D; van Eekelen R; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Rijswijk J; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Traas MAF; van Peperstraten AM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; Lambeek AF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Tros R; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jun; 39(6):1222-1230. PubMed ID: 38600625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
    Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discordant relationship between Essure microinsert position and tubal occlusion.
    Hou MY
    BMJ Case Rep; 2016 Jul; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27466315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
    Exacoustos C; Pizzo A; Lazzeri L; Pietropolli A; Piccione E; Zupi E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre-hysterectomy assessment of immediate tubal occlusion with the third-generation ESSURE insert (ESS505).
    Thiel J; Rattray D; Cher DJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1055-60. PubMed ID: 24861649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing.
    Emanuel MH; van Vliet M; Weber M; Exalto N
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan; 27(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 22064649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
    Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of prior hysterosalpingo-foam sonography or hysterosalpingography on tubal patency: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
    Kamphuis D; van Welie N; van Rijswijk J; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Dreyer K; Mijatovic V;
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Nov; 39(11):2485-2490. PubMed ID: 39190881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Saline-Air Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography Is Equivalent to the Modified Hysterosalpingogram Following Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
    Luong E; Ludwin A; Winter T; Yaklic J; Maxwell RA; Bhagavath B; Lindheim SR
    Ultrasound Q; 2020 Jun; 36(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 32511207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Essure Permanent Birth Control, Effectiveness and Safety: An Italian 11-Year Survey.
    Franchini M; Zizolfi B; Coppola C; Bergamini V; Bonin C; Borsellino G; Busato E; Calabrese S; Calzolari S; Fantin GP; Giarrè G; Litta P; Luerti M; Mangino FP; Marchino GL; Molinari MA; Scatena E; Scrimin F; Telloli P; Di Spiezio Sardo A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):640-645. PubMed ID: 28232037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can hysterosalpingo-foam sonography replace hysterosalpingography as first-choice tubal patency test? A randomized non-inferiority trial.
    van Welie N; van Rijswijk J; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Traas MAF; van Peperstraten AM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; Lambeek AF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Tros R; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 35220432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.