These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2934505)

  • 1. Size in the visual processing of faces and words.
    Kolers PA; Duchnicky RL; Sundstroem G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Dec; 11(6):726-51. PubMed ID: 2934505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERP profiles for face and word recognition are based on their status in semantic memory not their stimulus category.
    Nie A; Griffin M; Keinath A; Walsh M; Dittmann A; Reder L
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1557():66-73. PubMed ID: 24530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognizing faces.
    Bruce V
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1983 Aug; 302(1110):423-36. PubMed ID: 6137848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing times for English and Chinese words.
    Hoosain R; Osgood CE
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 6664815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateral specialization for recognition of words and faces in good and poor readers.
    Marcel T; Rajan P
    Neuropsychologia; 1975 Oct; 13(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 1196483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 528937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual laterality and the acuity gradient: potential artifacts and control procedures.
    Hellige JB
    Brain Cogn; 1986 Jul; 5(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 3756009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords.
    Reber R; Zimmermann TD; Wurtz P
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1105-14. PubMed ID: 15751469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of faces.
    Barrett SE; Rugg MD
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(7):913-22. PubMed ID: 2771030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct comparison of the neural substrates of recognition memory for words and faces.
    Kim JJ; Andreasen NC; O'Leary DS; Wiser AK; Ponto LL; Watkins GL; Hichwa RD
    Brain; 1999 Jun; 122 ( Pt 6)():1069-83. PubMed ID: 10356060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Encoding and contextual components of word recognition in good and poor readers.
    Simpson GB; Lorsbach TC; Whitehouse D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1983 Feb; 35(1):161-71. PubMed ID: 6827215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons.
    Banks WP; Flora J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1977 May; 3(2):278-90. PubMed ID: 864399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification and pronunciation effects in a verbal reaction time task for words, pseudowords, and letters.
    Rossmeissl PG; Theios J
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 7176904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.
    Shaki S; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11958352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies.
    Grainger J; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 2304817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of depth of processing on recognition memory for normal and inverted photographs of faces.
    McKelvie SJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):503-8. PubMed ID: 4000868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition and lexical decision without detection: unconscious perception?
    Merikle PM; Reingold EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):574-83. PubMed ID: 2144572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.