202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29345073)
1. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction in Brangus cattle by adding animals with imputed low-density SNP genotypes.
Lopes FB; Wu XL; Li H; Xu J; Perkins T; Genho J; Ferretti R; Tait RG; Bauck S; Rosa GJM
J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Feb; 135(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 29345073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of training strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictors in United States Red Angus cattle.
Lee J; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3406-3414. PubMed ID: 28805929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips.
Segelke D; Chen J; Liu Z; Reinhardt F; Thaller G; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5403-5411. PubMed ID: 22916947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.
Khatkar MS; Moser G; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW
BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():538. PubMed ID: 23043356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic prediction of breeding values for carcass traits in Nellore cattle.
Fernandes Júnior GA; Rosa GJ; Valente BD; Carvalheiro R; Baldi F; Garcia DA; Gordo DG; Espigolan R; Takada L; Tonussi RL; de Andrade WB; Magalhães AF; Chardulo LA; Tonhati H; de Albuquerque LG
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():7. PubMed ID: 26830208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits of beef cattle using 50K and imputed HD genotypes.
Lu D; Akanno EC; Crowley JJ; Schenkel F; Li H; De Pauw M; Moore SS; Wang Z; Li C; Stothard P; Plastow G; Miller SP; Basarab JA
J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1342-53. PubMed ID: 27135994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips.
Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
Gunia M; Saintilan R; Venot E; Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Phocas F
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3258-69. PubMed ID: 24948648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
