197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29345612)
1. Fit Characteristics of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators and the Accuracy of the User Seal Check among Koreans.
Huh YJ; Jeong HM; Lim J; Park HY; Kim MY; Oh HS; Huh K
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):104-107. PubMed ID: 29345612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.
Rengasamy S; Walbert GF; Newcomb WE; Faulkner K; Rengasamy MM; Brannen JJ; Szalajda JV
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 24107745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.
Hon CY; Danyluk Q; Bryce E; Janssen B; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Shen H; Astrakianakis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar; 14(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 27717300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing mask fit and usability of traditional and nanofibre N95 filtering facepiece respirators before and after nursing procedures.
Suen LKP; Guo YP; Ho SSK; Au-Yeung CH; Lam SC
J Hosp Infect; 2020 Mar; 104(3):336-343. PubMed ID: 31545991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity and specificity of the user-seal-check in determining the fit of N95 respirators.
Lam SC; Lee JK; Yau SY; Charm CY
J Hosp Infect; 2011 Mar; 77(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 21236516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized crossover study comparing quantitative fit tests between Trident™ and 3M™ Aura™ N95/P2 respirators.
Williams DL; Kave B; Begg F; Bodas C; Ng I
Infect Dis Health; 2022 May; 27(2):61-65. PubMed ID: 34799300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physiologic and fit factor profiles of N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators for use in hot, humid environments.
Kim JH; Wu T; Powell JB; Roberge RJ
Am J Infect Control; 2016 Feb; 44(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 26476496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health care workers and respiratory protection: is the user seal check a surrogate for respirator fit-testing?
Danyluk Q; Hon CY; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Bryce E; Janssen B; Astrakianakis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 May; 8(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 21462067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subject validation of reusable N95 stop-gap filtering facepiece respirators in COVID-19 pandemic.
Ng WCK; Mbadjeu Hondjeu AR; Syrett A; Caragata R; Rozenberg D; Xiao Z; Anwari V; Trac J; Mashari A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242304. PubMed ID: 33186406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Respirator Performance against Nanoparticles under Simulated Workplace Activities.
Vo E; Zhuang Z; Horvatin M; Liu Y; He X; Rengasamy S
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Oct; 59(8):1012-21. PubMed ID: 26180261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 22294504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect on Fit of Multiple Consecutive Donning and Doffing of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
Vuma CD; Manganyi J; Wilson K; Rees D
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Oct; 63(8):930-936. PubMed ID: 31504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field Evaluation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators on Construction Jobsites for Protection against Airborne Ultrafine Particles.
Adhikari A; Mitra A; Rashidi A; Ekpo I; Schwartz J; Doehling J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30205526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protection factor for N95 filtering facepiece respirators exposed to laboratory aerosols containing different concentrations of nanoparticles.
Rengasamy S; Walbert G; Newcomb W; Coffey C; Wassell JT; Szalajda J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Apr; 59(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 25429023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the benefit of the user seal check on N95 filtering facepiece respirator fit.
Viscusi DJ; Bergman MS; Zhuang Z; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 22606976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
