These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29346854)

  • 21. Reduction in advanced breast cancer after introduction of a mammography screening program in Tyrol/Austria.
    Oberaigner W; Geiger-Gritsch S; Edlinger M; Daniaux M; Knapp R; Hubalek M; Siebert U; Marth C; Buchberger W
    Breast; 2017 Jun; 33():178-182. PubMed ID: 28419909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Attendance in the second phase (2004-2005) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Budai A; Kövi R; Ember I
    Orv Hetil; 2008 Aug; 149(32):1491-8. PubMed ID: 18672438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Barriers to Organized Mammography Screening Programs in Hungary: A Questionnaire-based Study of 3,313 Women.
    Újhelyi M; Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Kovács E; Kenessey I; Bak M; Kásler M; Kovács T; Mátrai Z
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Mar; 38(3):1727-1734. PubMed ID: 29491109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. National program of breast cancer early detection in Brod-Posavina County (East Croatia).
    Jurišić I; Kolovrat A; Mitrečić D; Cvitković A
    Coll Antropol; 2014 Sep; 38(3):961-7. PubMed ID: 25420380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The attendance of the first screening round (2002-2003) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program and its effect on the number of diagnostic and screening mammography].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Csaba D; Budai A; Ember I
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Sep; 146(38):1963-70. PubMed ID: 16238249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study.
    Hobbs P; Kay C; Friedman EH; St Leger AS; Lambert C; Boggis CR; Howard TM; Owen AW; Asbury DL
    BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6764):1314-6. PubMed ID: 2271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Leutner C; Schild HH; Schrading S
    Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28221097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening.
    Jacobsen KK; von Euler-Chelpin M
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2012 Jun; 34(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 22233570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How frequently should women undergo mammography screening?
    Ciatto S
    Womens Health (Lond); 2010 Mar; 6(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 20187719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trends in mammography utilization for breast cancer screening in a Middle-Eastern country: Lebanon 2005-2013.
    Haddad FG; Kourie HR; Adib SM
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 39(6):819-24. PubMed ID: 26651440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cognitive and affective correlates of decisional balance regarding screening mammography in older women.
    Phillips CA; Green HJ; Morrissey SA
    Psychol Health Med; 2012; 17(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 21780961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Breast Cancer screening in Minas Gerais: assessment of data from information health systems of the Brazilian National Health System.
    Corrêa CSL; Pereira LC; Leite ICG; Fayer VA; Guerra MR; Bustamante-Teixeira MT
    Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(3):481-492. PubMed ID: 28977173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence.
    Schopper D; de Wolf C
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jul; 45(11):1916-23. PubMed ID: 19398327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
    Nowicki A; Stogowska I
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Image quality of mammography in Croatian nationwide screening program: comparison between various types of facilities.
    Brnić Z; Blašković D; Klasić B; Ramač JP; Flegarić-Bradić M; Stimac D; Lubina IZ; Brnić V; Faj D
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e478-85. PubMed ID: 21715115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.
    Théberge I; Chang SL; Vandal N; Daigle JM; Guertin MH; Pelletier E; Brisson J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Mar; 106(3):djt461. PubMed ID: 24598715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Attendance in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme].
    Sebuødegård S; Sagstad S; Hofvind S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2016 Sep; 136(17):1448-51. PubMed ID: 27686204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age differences in mammography screening reconsidered: life course trajectories in 13 European countries.
    Missinne S; Bracke P
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Apr; 25(2):314-20. PubMed ID: 24997204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. National Health Service breast screening programme results for 1991-2.
    Chamberlain J; Moss SM; Kirkpatrick AE; Michell M; Johns L
    BMJ; 1993 Aug; 307(6900):353-6. PubMed ID: 8374416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.