These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29347829)

  • 1. Biofilm community structure and the associated drag penalties of a groomed fouling release ship hull coating.
    Hunsucker KZ; Vora GJ; Hunsucker JT; Gardner H; Leary DH; Kim S; Lin B; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2018 Feb; 34(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 29347829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of hydrodynamic stress on the frictional drag of biofouling communities.
    Hunsucker JT; Hunsucker KZ; Gardner H; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2016 Nov; 32(10):1209-1221. PubMed ID: 27744722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diatom community structure on in-service cruise ship hulls.
    Hunsucker KZ; Koka A; Lund G; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2014 Oct; 30(9):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25377486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grooming using rotating brushes as a proactive method to control ship hull fouling.
    Tribou M; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2015; 31(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 25981344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of grooming on a copper ablative coating: a six year study.
    Tribou M; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2017 Jul; 33(6):494-504. PubMed ID: 28604166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diatom community structure on commercially available ship hull coatings.
    Zargiel KA; Coogan JS; Swain GW
    Biofouling; 2011 Oct; 27(9):955-65. PubMed ID: 21932984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of proactive in-water grooming to improve the performance of ship hull antifouling coatings.
    Tribou M; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2010 Jan; 26(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 20390556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static vs dynamic settlement and adhesion of diatoms to ship hull coatings.
    Zargiel KA; Swain GW
    Biofouling; 2014 Jan; 30(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 24279838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship.
    Schultz MP; Bendick JA; Holm ER; Hertel WM
    Biofouling; 2011 Jan; 27(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 21161774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of diatomaceous biofilms on the frictional drag of fouling-release coatings.
    Schultz MP; Walker JM; Steppe CN; Flack KA
    Biofouling; 2015; 31(9-10):759-73. PubMed ID: 26652667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of hydrodynamic drag on experimental fouling-release surfaces, using rotating disks.
    Holm ER; Schultz MP; Haslbeck EG; Talbott WJ; Field AJ
    Biofouling; 2004; 20(4-5):219-26. PubMed ID: 15621643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transported biofilms and their influence on subsequent macrofouling colonization.
    Sweat LH; Swain GW; Hunsucker KZ; Johnson KB
    Biofouling; 2017 May; 33(5):433-449. PubMed ID: 28508710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of mechanical grooming at various frequencies on a large scale test panel coated with a fouling-release coating.
    Hearin J; Hunsucker KZ; Swain G; Gardner H; Stephens A; Lieberman K
    Biofouling; 2016; 32(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 27051969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of long-term mechanical grooming on large-scale test panels coated with an antifouling and a fouling-release coating.
    Hearin J; Hunsucker KZ; Swain G; Stephens A; Gardner H; Lieberman K; Harper M
    Biofouling; 2015; 31(8):625-38. PubMed ID: 26359541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of 'in-service' conditions - mimicked hull roughness ranges and biofilms - on the surface and the hydrodynamic characteristics of foul-release type coatings.
    Yeginbayeva IA; Atlar M; Turkmen S; Chen H
    Biofouling; 2020 Oct; 36(9):1074-1089. PubMed ID: 33291985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of the ship drag penalty arising from light calcareous tubeworm fouling.
    Monty JP; Dogan E; Hanson R; Scardino AJ; Ganapathisubramani B; Hutchins N
    Biofouling; 2016; 32(4):451-64. PubMed ID: 26958740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grooming of fouling-release coatings to control marine fouling and determining how grooming affects the surface.
    Dahlgren J; Foy L; Hunsucker K; Gardner H; Swain G; Stafslien SJ; Vanderwal L; Bahr J; Webster DC
    Biofouling; 2022 Apr; 38(4):384-400. PubMed ID: 35655420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using ultraviolet light for improved antifouling performance on ship hull coatings.
    Hunsucker KZ; Braga C; Gardner H; Jongerius M; Hietbrink R; Salters B; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2019 Jul; 35(6):658-668. PubMed ID: 31385534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drag-reducing riblets with fouling-release properties: development and testing.
    Benschop HOG; Guerin AJ; Brinkmann A; Dale ML; Finnie AA; Breugem WP; Clare AS; Stübing D; Price C; Reynolds KJ
    Biofouling; 2018 May; 34(5):532-544. PubMed ID: 29806493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roughness effects of diatomaceous slime fouling on turbulent boundary layer hydrodynamics.
    Murphy EAK; Barros JM; Schultz MP; Flack KA; Steppe CN; Reidenbach MA
    Biofouling; 2018 Oct; 34(9):976-988. PubMed ID: 30602310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.