197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29348735)
1. Dosimetric evaluation of image based brachytherapy using tandem ovoid and tandem ring applicators.
Rangarajan R
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2018; 23(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 29348735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT based 3-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix: comparison between dose-volume histograms and ICRU point doses to the rectum and bladder.
Hashim N; Jamalludin Z; Ung NM; Ho GF; Malik RA; Phua VC
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5259-64. PubMed ID: 25040985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study.
Serban M; Kirisits C; de Leeuw A; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Nesvacil N; Swamidas J; Hudej R; Lowe G; Hellebust TP; Menon G; Oinam A; Bownes P; Oosterveld B; De Brabandere M; Koedooder K; Langeland Marthinsen AB; Whitney D; Lindegaard J; Tanderup K;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Apr; 106(5):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 32007365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of tandem and ring versus tandem and ovoids intracavitary applicators.
Ma JK; Mourad WF; Allbright R; Packianathan S; Harrell LM; Chinchar E; Nguyen A; Vijayakumar S
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2015 Jun; 7(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 26207110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dose differences between intracavitary applicators for cervical brachytherapy using knowledge-based models.
Kallis K; Mayadev J; Covele B; Brown D; Scanderbeg D; Simon A; Frisbie-Firsching H; Yashar CM; Einck JP; Mell LK; Moore KL; Meyers SM
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(6):1323-1333. PubMed ID: 34607771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Method to assess the need for re-planning HDR brachytherapy tandem and ring treatments.
Gray T; Cherian S; Amarnath S; Guo B; Xia P; Wilkinson A
Med Dosim; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38616141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparision of four different dose specification methods for high-dose-rate intracavitary radiation for treatment of cervical cancer.
Mai J; Erickson B; Rownd J; Gillin M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1131-41. PubMed ID: 11704338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of ICRU point doses and volumetric doses of organs at risk (OARs) in brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Vinod SK; Caldwell K; Lau A; Fowler AR
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Jun; 55(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21696566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer.
Gursel SB; Serarslan A; Meydan AD; Okumus N; Yasayacak T
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2020 Apr; 12(2):111-117. PubMed ID: 32395134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of dosimetric parameters in high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy using tandem and ring applicators: is the combination of a rectal retractor and radio-opaque vaginal packing better than rectal retractor alone for rectum sparing in cervical cancer?
Vats S; Thakur S; Sharma M; Gupta M; Chandrakant L; Negi M; Verma S; Negi A; Kumar V; Sharma P; Negi RM
Ecancermedicalscience; 2022; 16():1439. PubMed ID: 36200012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison of tandem and Ovoids vs. tandem and ring for intracavitary gynecologic applications.
Levin D; Menhel J; Rabin T; Pfeffer MR; Symon Z
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 18973861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Point vs. volumetric bladder and rectal doses in combined intracavitary-interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy: correlation and comparison with published Vienna applicator data.
Yaparpalvi R; Mutyala S; Gorla GR; Butler J; Mah D; Garg MK; Kalnicki S
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 18782683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can MRI-only replace MRI-CT planning with a titanium tandem and ovoid applicator?
Harkenrider MM; Patel R; Surucu M; Chinsky B; Mysz ML; Wood A; Ryan K; Shea SM; Small W; Roeske JC
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(5):747-752. PubMed ID: 29945764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dose volume parameters evaluated using three forward planning - optimization techniques in cervical cancer brachytherapy involving two applicators.
Chakrabarti B; Basu-Roy S; Kar SK; Das S; Lahiri A
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2017 Oct; 9(5):431-445. PubMed ID: 29204164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 2D vs. 3D dosimetry for Rotte 'Y' applicator high dose rate brachytherapy for medically inoperable endometrial cancer.
Beriwal S; Kim H; Heron DE; Selvaraj R
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 5(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 16981795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiography-based treatment planning compared with computed tomography (CT)-based treatment planning for intracavitary brachytherapy in cancer of the cervix: analysis of dose-volume histograms.
Kim RY; Pareek P
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 15062127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric impact of applicator displacement on three-dimensional image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatments for cervical cancer.
Jayarathna S; Hoang M; Badkul R; Hoover A
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2023 Oct; 15(5):334-343. PubMed ID: 38026073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image-based three-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix: dose-volume histograms of the bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, and small bowel.
Kim RY; Shen S; Duan J
Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 17606413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of tandem and ring versus tandem and ovoids intracavitary application in cervical cancer.
Atasever Akkas E; Altundag MB
J BUON; 2021; 26(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 34268923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between DVH-based doses and ICRU point-based doses to the rectum and the bladder using CT-based high-dose rate brachytherapy to the cervix.
Rangarajan R; Subramanian S; Gopalakrishnan K
Med Dosim; 2018 Autumn; 43(3):276-283. PubMed ID: 29198390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
