94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29349795)
21. Testing alternative regression models to predict utilities: mapping the QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L and the SF-6D.
Lamu AN; Olsen JA
Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2823-2839. PubMed ID: 30173314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands.
Berkhof J; Coupé VM; Bogaards JA; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 127(9):2147-58. PubMed ID: 20112339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality of Life and General Health After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Pathologies: Determining a Valid and Responsive Metric of Health State Utility.
Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Godil SS; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Neurosurgery; 2015 Oct; 77(4):553-60; discussion 560. PubMed ID: 26191977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The health and economic impact of cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients.
Wong G; Howard K; Webster A; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Transplantation; 2009 Apr; 87(7):1078-91. PubMed ID: 19352131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost-effectiveness of primary cytology and HPV DNA cervical screening.
Bistoletti P; Sennfält K; Dillner J
Int J Cancer; 2008 Jan; 122(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 17935124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination for adult women in the Netherlands.
Bogaards JA; Coupé VM; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J
Vaccine; 2011 Nov; 29(48):8929-36. PubMed ID: 21945961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccines in the prevention of cervical cancer in Malaysia.
Ezat SW; Aljunid S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(4):943-51. PubMed ID: 21133606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. To expand coverage, or increase frequency: Quantifying the tradeoffs between equity and efficiency facing cervical cancer screening programs in low-resource settings.
Campos NG; Tsu V; Jeronimo J; Mvundura M; Lee K; Kim JJ
Int J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 140(6):1293-1305. PubMed ID: 27925175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-effectiveness analysis of HPV vaccination alongside cervical cancer screening programme in Slovenia.
Obradovic M; Mrhar A; Kos M
Eur J Public Health; 2010 Aug; 20(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 20624834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Chapter 19: Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening.
Goldie SJ; Kim JJ; Myers E
Vaccine; 2006 Aug; 24 Suppl 3():S3/164-70. PubMed ID: 16950004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Implementation of DNA-HPV primary screening in Italian cervical cancer screening programmes. Results of the MIDDIR Project].
Di Stefano F; Giorgi Rossi P; Carozzi F; Ronco G; Cacciani L; Vecchi S; Naldoni C; Segnan N;
Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 28627153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A model to evaluate the costs and clinical effectiveness of human papilloma virus screening compared with annual papanicolaou cytology in Germany.
Petry KU; Barth C; Wasem J; Neumann A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 May; 212():132-139. PubMed ID: 28363186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-effectiveness of two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in Singapore.
Tay SK; Lee BW; Sohn WY; Lee IH; Mathur G; Sanicas M; Van Kriekinge G
Singapore Med J; 2018 Jul; 59(7):370-382. PubMed ID: 28983579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in the context of high cervical cancer incidence and low screening coverage.
Võrno T; Lutsar K; Uusküla A; Padrik L; Raud T; Reile R; Nahkur O; Kiivet RA
Vaccine; 2017 Nov; 35(46):6329-6335. PubMed ID: 28899625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
Berkhof J; Bogaards JA; Demirel E; Diaz M; Sharma M; Kim JJ
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 7():H71-9. PubMed ID: 24332299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact on women's health and the cervical cancer screening budget of primary HPV screening with dual-stain cytology triage in Belgium.
Tjalma WAA; Kim E; Vandeweyer K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 May; 212():171-181. PubMed ID: 28081908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the preference-based EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D instruments.
Kontodimopoulos N; Aletras VH; Paliouras D; Niakas D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1151-7. PubMed ID: 19558372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cost-effectiveness of increasing cervical cancer screening coverage in the Middle East: An example from Lebanon.
Sharma M; Seoud M; Kim JJ
Vaccine; 2017 Jan; 35(4):564-569. PubMed ID: 28017434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention.
Simonella L; Howard K; Canfell K
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Dec; 7():899. PubMed ID: 25495005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
