These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29349801)

  • 1. Evaluating the effects of rater and subject factors on measures of association.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):639-656. PubMed ID: 29349801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the influence of rater and subject characteristics on measures of agreement for ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3181-3199. PubMed ID: 28612356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Summary measures of agreement and association between many raters' ordinal classifications.
    Mitani AA; Freer PE; Nelson KP
    Ann Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):677-685.e4. PubMed ID: 29029991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3116-32. PubMed ID: 26095449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring intrarater association between correlated ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Zhou TJ; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 32529683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A measure of association for ordered categorical data in population-based studies.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):812-831. PubMed ID: 27184590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A paired kappa to compare binary ratings across two medical tests.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3272-3287. PubMed ID: 31099902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods of assessing categorical agreement between correlated screening tests in clinical studies.
    Zhou TJ; Raza S; Nelson KP
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(10):1861-1881. PubMed ID: 34305250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring rater bias in diagnostic tests with ordinal ratings.
    Kim C; Lin X; Nelson KP
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(17):4014-4033. PubMed ID: 33969509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the reliability of diagnostic tests in population-based agreement studies.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 20128018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weighted least-squares approach for comparing correlated kappa.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12495157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Homogeneity score test of AC
    Honda C; Ohyama T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 32020851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women's features and inter-/intra-rater agreement on mammographic density assessment in full-field digital mammograms (DDM-SPAIN).
    Pérez-Gómez B; Ruiz F; Martínez I; Casals M; Miranda J; Sánchez-Contador C; Vidal C; Llobet R; Pollán M; Salas D
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 132(1):287-95. PubMed ID: 22042363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying rater variation for ordinal data using a rating scale model.
    Zhang S; Petersen JH
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(14):2223-2237. PubMed ID: 29663479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling patterns of agreement and disagreement.
    Agresti A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1992; 1(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 1341658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of grey zones on the accuracy of agreement measures for ordinal tables.
    Tran QD; Dolgun A; Demirhan H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):70. PubMed ID: 33853549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hubert's multi-rater kappa revisited.
    Martín Andrés A; Álvarez Hernández M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 31056757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing rater agreement using marginal association models.
    Perkins SM; Becker MP
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1743-60. PubMed ID: 12111909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gwet's AC1 is not a substitute for Cohen's kappa - A comparison of basic properties.
    Vach W; Gerke O
    MethodsX; 2023; 10():102212. PubMed ID: 37234937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.