151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29350002)
1. [Progress on laminoplasty in spinal canal disease].
Chen JM; Liu GY; Zhang Y; Zhao JN
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Feb; 30(2):125-131. PubMed ID: 29350002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Discussion of surgical indications for posterior expansive open-door laminoplasty extended to C1 level].
Li Q; Kong Q; Zhang L; Sun T; Li T; Gong Q; Song Y; Liu H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 27(10):1214-20. PubMed ID: 24397134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical effects of laminoplasty versus laminectomy: stenosis and stability.
Subramaniam V; Chamberlain RH; Theodore N; Baek S; Safavi-Abbasi S; Senoğlu M; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):E573-8. PubMed ID: 19770600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of clinical results of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy focusing on spinal cord motion in intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Naruse T; Yanase M; Takahashi H; Horie Y; Ito M; Imaizumi T; Oguri K; Matsuyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2634-41. PubMed ID: 19910766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Biomechanical analysis of miniplate fixation systems in restorative laminoplasty for spinal canal reconstruction].
Chen J; Liu G; Bao T; Bai T; Zhang E; Zhao J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2023 Mar; 43(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 37087576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of spinal canal expansion following cervical laminoplasty: a computer-simulated comparison between single and double-door techniques.
Wang XY; Dai LY; Xu HZ; Chi YL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2863-70. PubMed ID: 17108843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and functional outcomes of laminoplasty and laminectomy.
Hardman J; Graf O; Kouloumberis PE; Gao WH; Chan M; Roitberg BZ
Neurol Res; 2010 May; 32(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 19589202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior approach to the degenerative cervical spine.
Yonenobu K; Oda T
Eur Spine J; 2003 Oct; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S195-201. PubMed ID: 12942354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploration and decompression of the spinal canal using split laminotomy and its modification, the "archbone" technique.
Banczerowski P; Vajda J; Veres R
Neurosurgery; 2008 May; 62(5 Suppl 2):ONS432-40; discussion ONS440-1. PubMed ID: 18596526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extraordinary positional cervical spinal cord compression in extension position as a rare cause of postoperative progressive myelopathy after cervical posterior laminoplasty detected using the extension/flexion positional CT myelography: one case after laminectomy following failure of a single-door laminoplasty/one case after double-door laminoplasty without interlaminar spacers.
Fujiwara Y; Manabe H; Harada T; Izumi B; Adachi N
Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(Suppl 1):170-177. PubMed ID: 28247081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modified plate-only open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy.
Yang L; Gu Y; Shi J; Gao R; Liu Y; Li J; Yuan W
Orthopedics; 2013 Jan; 36(1):e79-87. PubMed ID: 23276358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty?: a prospective study.
Katsumi K; Yamazaki A; Watanabe K; Ohashi M; Shoji H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):748-54. PubMed ID: 21912316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical laminectomy vs laminoplasty: is there a difference in outcome and postoperative pain?
Nurboja B; Kachramanoglou C; Choi D
Neurosurgery; 2012 Apr; 70(4):965-70; discussion 970. PubMed ID: 22015812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and stability of open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty.
Lee TT; Green BA; Gromelski EB
J Spinal Disord; 1998 Feb; 11(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 9493764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The results of laminectomy and laminoplasty in cervical myeloradiculopathy.
Skowroński J; Bielecki M
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst (1989); 1992; 37():71-3. PubMed ID: 1286143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laminar closure after classic Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty.
Lee DH; Park SA; Kim NH; Hwang CJ; Kim YT; Lee CS; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1634-40. PubMed ID: 21336233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A segmental partial laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anatomical basis and clinical outcome in comparison with expansive open-door laminoplasty.
Otani K; Sato K; Yabuki S; Iwabuchi M; Kikuchi S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 19179921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Posterior approach to the degenerative cervical spine].
Yonenobu K; Wada E; Suzuki S; Kanazawa A
Orthopade; 1996 Nov; 25(6):533-541. PubMed ID: 28246778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Combined cervical posterior-anterior operation for treatment of cervical spinal canal stenosis with reverse arch].
Hu W; Ma X; Sun T; Fang Z; Zhang X; Cui Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 27(4):385-8. PubMed ID: 23757860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Kinetic analysis of the cervical spinal cord in patients after spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique.
Miyata K; Marui T; Miura J; Yoshiya S; Fujii M; Kurosaka M; Doita M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E690-7. PubMed ID: 16946642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
