These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29350217)

  • 21. Environmental impacts of dietary shifts in India: A modelling study using nationally-representative data.
    Aleksandrowicz L; Green R; Joy EJM; Harris F; Hillier J; Vetter SH; Smith P; Kulkarni B; Dangour AD; Haines A
    Environ Int; 2019 May; 126():207-215. PubMed ID: 30802638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Defining System Boundaries of an Institution Nitrogen Footprint.
    de la Reguera E; Castner EA; Galloway JN; Leach AM; Leary N; Tang J
    Sustainability (New Rochelle); 2017 Apr; 10(2):123-130. PubMed ID: 29350212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting.
    Huang YA; Weber CL; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(22):8509-15. PubMed ID: 20028044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities.
    Jones CM; Kammen DM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 May; 45(9):4088-95. PubMed ID: 21449584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Demographic Scenarios of Future Environmental Footprints of Healthy Diets in China.
    Han A; Chai L; Liao X
    Foods; 2020 Jul; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 32751477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is the nitrogen footprint fit for purpose? An assessment of models and proposed uses.
    Einarsson R; Cederberg C
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 240():198-208. PubMed ID: 30939400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.
    Rotz CA; Isenberg BJ; Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5427-37. PubMed ID: 24146148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Environmental and resource burdens associated with world biofuel production out to 2050: footprint components from carbon emissions and land use to waste arisings and water consumption.
    Hammond GP; Li B
    Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2016 Sep; 8(5):894-908. PubMed ID: 27610203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the carbon footprint of different patient diets in a Spanish hospital.
    Vidal R; Moliner E; Pikula A; Mena-Nieto A; Ortega A
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2015 Jan; 20(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25300288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chemical footprint: a methodological framework for bridging life cycle assessment and planetary boundaries for chemical pollution.
    Sala S; Goralczyk M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):623-32. PubMed ID: 23907984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Farm and product carbon footprints of China's fruit production--life cycle inventory of representative orchards of five major fruits.
    Yan M; Cheng K; Yue Q; Yan Y; Rees RM; Pan G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Mar; 23(5):4681-91. PubMed ID: 26527344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rethinking environmental stress from the perspective of an integrated environmental footprint: Application in the Beijing industry sector.
    Hu J; Huang K; Ridoutt BG; Yu Y; Wei J
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 637-638():1051-1060. PubMed ID: 29801201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The U.S. consumer phosphorus footprint: where do nitrogen and phosphorus diverge?
    Metson GS; MacDonald GK; Leach AM; Compton JE; Harrison JA; Galloway JN
    Environ Res Lett; 2020 Oct; 15():1-15. PubMed ID: 35990174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Research on the changing trend of the carbon footprint of residents' consumption in Beijing.
    Fan Z; Lei Y; Wu S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(4):4078-4090. PubMed ID: 30556122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A method for calculating a land-use change carbon footprint (LUC-CFP) for agricultural commodities - applications to Brazilian beef and soy, Indonesian palm oil.
    Persson UM; Henders S; Cederberg C
    Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Nov; 20(11):3482-91. PubMed ID: 24838193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of the carbon footprint of the Galician fishing activity (NW Spain).
    Iribarren D; Vázquez-Rowe I; Hospido A; Moreira MT; Feijoo G
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Oct; 408(22):5284-94. PubMed ID: 20800266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Overview on GHG emissions of raw milk production and a comparison of milk and cheese carbon footprints of two different systems from northern Spain.
    Laca A; Gómez N; Laca A; Díaz M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(2):1650-1666. PubMed ID: 31755063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Effect of reduced nitrogen fertilization on carbon footprint in spring maize-late rice production system].
    Yu XQ; Jiang ZH; Wang JH; Lin JD; Liu YZ; Yang JP
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Apr; 30(4):1397-1403. PubMed ID: 30994304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mapping the Carbon Footprint of Nations.
    Kanemoto K; Moran D; Hertwich EG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 50(19):10512-10517. PubMed ID: 27587304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Calculating the Carbon Footprint in ports by using a standardized tool.
    Azarkamand S; Ferré G; Darbra RM
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Sep; 734():139407. PubMed ID: 32460080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.