BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29350855)

  • 1. Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods.
    Alves PHM; Alves TCLP; Pegoraro TA; Costa YM; Bonfante EA; de Almeida ALPF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):280-284. PubMed ID: 29350855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement.
    Kan JY; Morimoto T; Rungcharassaeng K; Roe P; Smith DH
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Jun; 30(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 20386780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Periodontal Biotype: Gingival Thickness as It Relates to Probe Visibility and Buccal Plate Thickness.
    Frost NA; Mealey BL; Jones AA; Huynh-Ba G
    J Periodontol; 2015 Oct; 86(10):1141-9. PubMed ID: 26110452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Periodontal Biotype in a Young Chinese Population using Different Measurement Methods.
    Shao Y; Yin L; Gu J; Wang D; Lu W; Sun Y
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11212. PubMed ID: 30046153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Preliminary study on gingival biotype by periodontal probing].
    Le D; Zhang H; Hu WJ; Liu DG
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 47(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 22490242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva.
    De Rouck T; Eghbali R; Collys K; De Bruyn H; Cosyn J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 19419444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of gingival biotype and facial hard/soft tissue dimensions in the maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography.
    Amid R; Mirakhori M; Safi Y; Kadkhodazadeh M; Namdari M
    Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Jul; 79():1-6. PubMed ID: 28279824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Das G; Ahmed AR; Suleman G; Lal A; Rana MH; Ahmed N; Arora S
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Sep; 58(9):. PubMed ID: 36143989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The significance of biotype in the predictability of dental-periodontal treatment].
    Palkovics D; Gera I
    Fogorv Sz; 2016 Jun; 109(2):45-55. PubMed ID: 27544964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The gingival biotype: measurement of soft and hard tissue dimensions - a radiographic morphometric study.
    Stein JM; Lintel-Höping N; Hammächer C; Kasaj A; Tamm M; Hanisch O
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Dec; 40(12):1132-9. PubMed ID: 24102580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: an in vivo study.
    Cook DR; Mealey BL; Verrett RG; Mills MP; Noujeim ME; Lasho DJ; Cronin RJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011; 31(4):345-54. PubMed ID: 21837300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is measurement of the gingival biotype reliable? Agreement among different assessment methods.
    Aguilar-Duran L; Mir-Mari J; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 Jan; 25(1):e144-e149. PubMed ID: 31880279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CBCT analysis of schneiderian membrane thickness and its relationship with gingival biotype and arch form.
    Chaturvedi S; Haralur SB; Addas MK; Alfarsi MA
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 31607738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Gingival thickness assessment of gingival recession teeth].
    Chen ZY; Zhong JS; Ouyang XY; Zhou SY; Xie Y; Lou XZ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Apr; 52(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 32306020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Method and its application of gingival thickness measurement based on cone-beam computed tomography].
    Cao J; Hu WJ; Zhang H; Liu DG; LE D
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Feb; 45(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 23411536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative assesment of gingival thickness using transgingival probing and ultrasonographic method.
    Savitha B; Vandana KL
    Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(4):135-9. PubMed ID: 16761705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians.
    Eghbali A; De Rouck T; De Bruyn H; Cosyn J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 36(11):958-63. PubMed ID: 19811580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of gingival thickness in multi-ethnic subjects with different gingival pigmentation levels.
    Nik-Azis NM; Razali M; Goh V; Ahmad Shuhaimi NN; Mohd Nazrin NAS
    J Clin Periodontol; 2023 Jan; 50(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 36089895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A pilot study on the consistency of biological widths measured by periodontal probe and cone-beam CT].
    Xu LM; Wang MY; Liu LX; Chen X; Wang QT
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 54(4):235-239. PubMed ID: 30955294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods to assess tooth gingival thickness and diagnose gingival phenotypes: A systematic review.
    Wang J; Cha S; Zhao Q; Bai D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):620-632. PubMed ID: 35297167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.