BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29351088)

  • 1. Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for non-coplanar IMRT.
    O'Connor D; Yu V; Nguyen D; Ruan D; Sheng K
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045015. PubMed ID: 29351088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
    Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT.
    Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ; Voet PW; Lanconelli N; Aluwini S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5441-58. PubMed ID: 22864234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.
    Nguyen D; Lyu Q; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Low DA; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4263. PubMed ID: 27370141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
    Gu W; O'Connor D; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3826-3834. PubMed ID: 32564353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deterministic direct aperture optimization using multiphase piecewise constant segmentation.
    Nguyen D; O'Connor D; Ruan D; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5596-5609. PubMed ID: 28834556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Per-fraction planning to enhance optimization degrees of freedom compared to the conventional single-plan approach.
    Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen B
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37524087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
    Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving intensity-modulated radiation therapy using the anatomic beam orientation optimization algorithm.
    Potrebko PS; McCurdy BM; Butler JB; El-Gubtan AS
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2170-9. PubMed ID: 18561692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A unified path seeking algorithm for IMRT and IMPT beam orientation optimization.
    Ramesh P; Valdes G; O'Connor D; Sheng K
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 68(19):. PubMed ID: 37659406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A fast deep learning approach for beam orientation optimization for prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie A; Ogunmolu O; Jiang S; Nguyen D
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):880-897. PubMed ID: 31868927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated generation of IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients with metal hip prostheses: comparison of different planning strategies.
    Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071704. PubMed ID: 23822408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of non-coplanar IMRT in the presence of target-embedded organs at risk.
    Bratengeier K; Holubyev K
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 10():207. PubMed ID: 26458947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TBS-BAO: fully automated beam angle optimization for IMRT guided by a total-beam-space reference plan.
    Schipaanboord BWK; Heijmen BJM; Breedveld S
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jan; 67(3):. PubMed ID: 35026742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards automated on-line adaptation of 2-Step IMRT plans: QUASIMODO phantom and prostate cancer cases.
    Holubyev K; Bratengeier K; Gainey M; Polat B; Flentje M
    Radiat Oncol; 2013 Nov; 8():263. PubMed ID: 24207129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
    Jeong Y; Lee SW; Kwak J; Cho I; Yoon SM; Kim JH; Park JH; Choi EK; Song SY; Kim YS; Kim SS; Joo JH; Ahn SD
    Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25175383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
    Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy using adaptive l(2,1)-minimization.
    Jia X; Men C; Lou Y; Jiang SB
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6205-22. PubMed ID: 21891848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetrically motivated beam-angle optimization for non-coplanar arc radiotherapy with and without dynamic collimator rotation.
    Bertholet J; Zhu C; Guyer G; Mueller S; Volken W; Mackeprang PH; Loebner HA; Stampanoni MFM; Aebersold DM; Fix MK; Manser P
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1326-1339. PubMed ID: 38131614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.