These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29352130)

  • 1. Equal status in Ultimatum Games promotes rational sharing.
    Han X; Cao S; Bao JZ; Wang WX; Zhang B; Gao ZY; Sánchez A
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1222. PubMed ID: 29352130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game.
    Sánchez-Amaro A; Rossano F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Nov; 288(1962):20211937. PubMed ID: 34727713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How much is our fairness worth? The effect of raising stakes on offers by Proposers and minimum acceptable offers in Dictator and Ultimatum Games.
    Novakova J; Flegr J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60966. PubMed ID: 23580080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.
    Rand DG; Tarnita CE; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Feb; 110(7):2581-6. PubMed ID: 23341593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game.
    Wittig M; Jensen K; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 23917161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Zheng Y; Guo X; Yang G
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():126-134. PubMed ID: 28223239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game.
    Ichinose G; Sayama H
    Sci Rep; 2014 May; 4():5104. PubMed ID: 24869922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influences of a Luck Game on Offers in Ultimatum and Dictator Games: Is There a Mediation of Emotions?
    Matarazzo O; Pizzini B; Greco C
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():13. PubMed ID: 32116888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are patients with schizophrenia rational maximizers? Evidence from an ultimatum game study.
    Csukly G; Polgár P; Tombor L; Réthelyi J; Kéri S
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 May; 187(1-2):11-7. PubMed ID: 21035194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empathy leads to fairness.
    Page KM; Nowak MA
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Nov; 64(6):1101-16. PubMed ID: 12508533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Emanuele E; Brondino N; Bertona M; Re S; Geroldi D
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 18448251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.
    Halali E; Bereby-Meyer Y; Ockenfels A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():240. PubMed ID: 23781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of anxiety on social decision-making: behavioral and electrodermal findings.
    Wu T; Luo Y; Broster LS; Gu R; Luo YJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 22670854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Symbolic distancing in sharing situations restrains children's economic behavior and potentially also their inequity aversion.
    Ebersbach M; Krupa J; Vogelsang M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Jun; 226():103579. PubMed ID: 35413612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game.
    Kubota JT; Li J; Bar-David E; Banaji MR; Phelps EA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2498-504. PubMed ID: 24121413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.