546 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29353371)
1. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
Samuel D; Vilardo N; Isani SS; Kuo DYS; Gressel GM
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 31324452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Online palliative care and oncology patient education resources through Google: Do they meet national health literacy recommendations?
Prabhu AV; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; Glaser C; Clump DA; Heron DE; Beriwal S
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(5):306-310. PubMed ID: 28341318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analyzing the Readability of Online Urogynecologic Patient Information.
Stewart JR; Heit MH; Meriwether KV; Hobson DT; Francis SL
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29117016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.
Prabhu AV; Kim C; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; DeFrances MC; Trejo Bittar HE
Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():15-20. PubMed ID: 28504209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.
Gulbrandsen TR; Skalitzky MK; Ryan SE; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Brown TS; Elkins JM
Iowa Orthop J; 2022; 42(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 36601227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation Oncology and Online Patient Education Materials: Deviating From NIH and AMA Recommendations.
Prabhu AV; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; Clump DA; Heron DE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):521-8. PubMed ID: 27681748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.
Sax L; Razak A; Shetty K; Cohen M; Levi J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():168-174. PubMed ID: 31326734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Orthopedic Oncology.
Para A; Thelmo F; Rynecki ND; Zelman B; Gupta R; Coban D; Ayyaswami V; Prabhu AV; Ippolito JA; Agarwal N; Moore JM; Beebe KS
Orthopedics; 2021 Jan; 44(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 33141234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testicular Cancer on the Web-an Appropriate Source of Patient Information in Concordance with the European Association of Urology Guidelines?
Paffenholz P; Salem J; Borgmann H; Nestler T; Pfister D; Ruf C; Tsaur I; Haferkamp A; Heidenreich A
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Dec; 33(6):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 28776306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Arthroscopy-Related Online Patient Education Materials.
Akinleye SD; Krochak R; Richardson N; Garofolo G; Culbertson MD; Erez O
Arthroscopy; 2018 Apr; 34(4):1272-1279. PubMed ID: 29287948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lower Back Pain Imaging: A Readability Analysis.
Valentine MJ; Cottone G; Kramer HD; Kayastha A; Kim J; Pettinelli NJ; Kramer RC
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45174. PubMed ID: 37842495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
