BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29353486)

  • 1. Assessing Mand Topography Preference When Developing a Functional Communication Training Intervention.
    Kunnavatana SS; Wolfe K; Aguilar AN
    Behav Modif; 2018 May; 42(3):364-381. PubMed ID: 29353486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lag Schedules and Functional Communication Training: Persistence of Mands and Relapse of Problem Behavior.
    Falcomata TS; Muething CS; Silbaugh BC; Adami S; Hoffman K; Shpall C; Ringdahl JE
    Behav Modif; 2018 May; 42(3):314-334. PubMed ID: 29169242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a pre-treatment assessment to select mand topographies for functional communication training.
    Ringdahl JE; Falcomata TS; Christensen TJ; Bass-Ringdahl SM; Lentz A; Dutt A; Schuh-Claus J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18672344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training.
    Winborn-Kemmerer L; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Kitsukawa K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 19721740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic Changes in Preference for Schedule-Thinning Arrangements as a Function of Relative Reinforcement Density.
    Briggs AM; Akers JS; Greer BD; Fisher WW; Retzlaff BJ
    Behav Modif; 2018 Jul; 42(4):472-497. PubMed ID: 29182009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Systematic Review of Parent-Implemented Functional Communication Training for Children With ASD.
    Gerow S; Hagan-Burke S; Rispoli M; Gregori E; Mason R; Ninci J
    Behav Modif; 2018 May; 42(3):335-363. PubMed ID: 29199433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of response preference on resistance to change.
    Ringdahl JE; Berg WK; Wacker DP; Crook K; Molony MA; Vargo KK; Neurnberger JE; Zabala K; Taylor CJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):265-280. PubMed ID: 29319190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction.
    Fisher WW; Greer BD; Querim AC; DeRosa N
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2614-23. PubMed ID: 25036315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior related to mands for rearrangement.
    Torres-Viso M; Strohmeier CW; Zarcone JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):158-165. PubMed ID: 29318608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages.
    Winborn L; Wacker DP; Richman DM; Asmus J; Geier D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 12365744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Renewal during functional communication training.
    Saini V; Sullivan WE; Baxter EL; DeRosa NM; Roane HS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jul; 51(3):603-619. PubMed ID: 29785807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of time in establishing operation on the effectiveness of functional communication training.
    Derosa NM; Fisher WW; Steege MW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):115-30. PubMed ID: 25420612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing Acquisition of and Preference for Mand Topographies During Functional Communication Training.
    Torelli JN; Lambert JM; Da Fonte MA; Denham KN; Jedrzynski TM; Houchins-Juarez NJ
    Behav Anal Pract; 2016 Jun; 9(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 27606246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment and extinction components of function-based interventions.
    Hanley GP; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Maglieri KA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 15898474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further Evaluation of the Use of Multiple Schedules for Behavior Maintained by Negative Reinforcement.
    Campos C; Leon Y; Sleiman A; Urcuyo B
    Behav Modif; 2017 Mar; 41(2):269-285. PubMed ID: 27680584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of delay to reinforcement and mand variability during functional communication training.
    Muething CS; Falcomata TS; Ferguson R; Swinnea S; Shpall C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Apr; 51(2):263-275. PubMed ID: 29446091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Replication and Extension of the Effects of Lag Schedules on Mand Variability and Challenging Behavior During Functional Communication Training.
    Silbaugh BC; Swinnea S; Falcomata TS
    Anal Verbal Behav; 2020 Jun; 36(1):49-73. PubMed ID: 32699738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does teaching an omnibus mand preclude the development of specifying mands?
    Ward SN; Hanley GP; Warner CA; Gage EE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jan; 54(1):248-269. PubMed ID: 33058160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adults with autism spectrum disorder as behavior technicians for young children with autism: Outcomes of a behavioral skills training program.
    Lerman DC; Hawkins L; Hillman C; Shireman M; Nissen MA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):233-56. PubMed ID: 25869079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parent Ratings of Generalized and Indirect Effects of Functional Communication Training for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
    O'Brien MJ; Pelzel KE; Hendrix NM; Schieltz KM; Miller K; Call NA; Tsami L; Lerman DC; Berg WK; Kopelman TG; Wacker DP; Lindgren SD
    Behav Modif; 2022 Sep; 46(5):971-1001. PubMed ID: 34041956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.