138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2935363)
1. Skin irritancy from nickel sulfate and test patches.
Wahlberg JE; Wahlberg E
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):224-5. PubMed ID: 2935363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of skin blood flow at patch test sites.
Wahlberg JE; Wahlberg EN
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Oct; 17(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 2962819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Patch testing with nickel compounds].
Hums R; Müller S
Dermatol Monatsschr; 1988; 174(12):730-5. PubMed ID: 3215375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Metallic nickel on skin and in artificial sweat. Case studies].
Hums R; Carlus V; Müller S
Dermatol Monatsschr; 1988; 174(12):723-9. PubMed ID: 2975233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cutaneous nickel sensitivity in Toronto, Canada.
Nethercott JR; Holness DL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1990 May; 22(5 Pt 1):756-61. PubMed ID: 2189907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
Fischer T; Maibach H
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose-response relationships for topically applied antigens.
Eun HC; Marks R
Br J Dermatol; 1990 Apr; 122(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 2186775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nickel dermatitis in infants.
Ho VC; Johnston MM
Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Nov; 15(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 3816189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Allergic and irritant skin reactions evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry.
Staberg B; Serup J
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Jan; 18(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 2964989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contact dermatitis in children.
Hjorth N
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1981; 95():36-9. PubMed ID: 6953714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple parameter assessment of skin irritancy.
Frödin T; Anderson C
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 2958238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch test irritancy quantified by laser Doppler flowmetry.
Wahlberg JE; Wahlberg E
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Oct; 11(4):257-8. PubMed ID: 6238802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patch testing for nickel allergy. The influence of the vehicle on the response rate to topical nickel sulphate.
Mendelow AY; Forsyth A; Florence AT; Baillie AJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Jul; 13(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 4042642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regional variations of patch test response in nickel-sensitive patients.
Lindelöf B
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Mar; 26(3):202-3. PubMed ID: 1505188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The nickel problem.
Blanco-Dalmau L
J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Jul; 48(1):99-101. PubMed ID: 6955512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
Serup J; Staberg B
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of patch testing in the management of dermatitides caused by orthopedic metallic prostheses.
Fisher AA
Cutis; 1984 Mar; 33(3):258, 264. PubMed ID: 6373164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of routine office patch testing.
Lepine EM
Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Apr; 2(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 1017185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential for irritation increases from the wrist to the cubital fossa.
Van der Valk PG; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 1989 Dec; 121(6):709-12. PubMed ID: 2611122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymphocyte transformation induced by nickel sulphate: an in vitro study of subjects with and without a positive nickel patch test.
Svejgaard E; Morling N; Svejgaard A; Veien NK
Acta Derm Venereol; 1978; 58(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 78640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
